Ann Coulter: Jerry Seinfeld Endorses Roy Moore?

Breitbart:  Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago — that’s why we have statutes of limitations — but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s — or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

 

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

more here

14 Comments on Ann Coulter: Jerry Seinfeld Endorses Roy Moore?

  1. Democrats have been relying on the art of the smear for decades. It didn’t work against Trump and it hopefully won’t work against Moore. The best part is while Moore clears the sh*t storm they set up for him their own have fallen on the sword and continue falling and their atrocious hypocritical behavior is being unmasked.

  2. The double standard is easy to understand if you think like a soulless democrat without any principles.

    Republicans are suppose to have things like values and morals, so even the slightest suggestion that a person up for office who holds conservative principle is enough to disqualify the individual.

    A democrat on the other hand is suppose to act like an uncontrolled sex fiend and steal and lie without regard to consequences, unless they somehow violate one of the aggrieved groups needed to form a viable voting block, then that offender must be sacrificed to make room for the next person with the right politically correct credentials and stated adherence to the progressive narrative.

    It’s no way to choose our leaders or run a country.

  3. I could never run for public office, if accused, couldn’t truthfully deny it.
    If you remember the ’60s and ’70s, you weren’t there.
    Do know I always liked older women.

  4. On tv cop shows they’re always asking “where were you on the XX/XX/XX at hour Y?” I can’t remember a week ago, how do you remember 40 years ago? I might remember an event but not the exact details.
    Make them testify and prosecute them for lying under oath.

  5. @Carter, The public might of but not the IRS.
    Was at a concert, open air stadium, The Killer rocked it, an outstanding concert.
    IRS/FBI, I dunno, black suits seized his check right there in front of the whole audience.
    Damnedest thing I have ever seen.

  6. “Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.”

    Which is why the GOP army of Surrender Monkeys is so infuriating.
    The Left justifies any means to their goals.
    The GOP is more limp than Wimpy from Popeye.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.