How bad is the bias against Trump when Harvard steps in and admits the level of pig-piling on our president is unprecedented for the last three decades?
A major new study out of Harvard University has revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s bias against Donald Trump.
They found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations.
Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility.
This study suggests that, at least when it comes to recent history, he’s right.
I think the bias and the vitriol and venom is much worse than what’s indicated in this study.
Calling the president unfit for command, a crook, a psychopath, a conspirator, an idiot, a sexual predator, a Nazi, a fascist, a dictator, a liar and every horrible charge you can think of falls under the same umbrella of negativity as the press saying “Obama plays too much golf.”
“It’s too soon for Obama to win the Nobel prize” is “negative press.”