Progfart Activist Judge Put In His Place By Justice Department

Dipwad judge, who simply stepped in to stop Trump EO on immigration, was told by Justice Department that he has no idea what he is doing.

The judge admits as much when he offers no explanation as to what his standing is, or his reasoning, simply stating that he “believes” Trump’s EO to be wrong.

Well, guess again, jerko.

Washington Examiner –

James Robart, the U.S. district judge in Washington State, offered little explanation for his decision to stop President Trump‘s executive order temporarily suspending non-American entry from seven terror-plagued countries. Robart simply declared his belief that Washington State, which in its lawsuit against Trump argued that the order is both illegal and unconstitutional, would likely win the case when it is tried.

Now the government has answered Robart, and unlike the judge, Justice Department lawyers have produced a point-by-point demolition of Washington State’s claims. Indeed, for all except the most partisan, it is likely impossible to read the Washington State lawsuit, plus Robart’s brief comments and writing on the matter, plus the Justice Department’s response, and not come away with the conclusion that the Trump order is on sound legal and constitutional ground.

Beginning with the big picture, the Justice Department argued that Robart’s restraining order violates the separation of powers, encroaches on the president’s constitutional and legal authority in the areas of foreign affairs, national security, and immigration, and “second-guesses the president’s national security judgment” about risks faced by the United States.

Despite the overwhelming strength of the administration’s argument, what happens next — as the case is argued in a liberal circuit and then possibly moves on to a Supreme Court divided evenly, 4 to 4, among liberal and conservative justices — is impossible to predict. But strength of the case does not assure victory. As Laura Ingraham, the conservative radio host who also served as a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, tweeted on Sunday: “The law is on Donald Trump‘s side. Doesn’t mean that the courts will follow it.”

~~~~~~~~

This is what happens when a dirtbag, wool-hatted, protesting thug happens to pass the bar. Adults have to step in and brainsplain to the addled.

(Ya, ya, this guy is supposedly a conservative… cur from the mold of the most disappointingly “conservative”  judges like Anthony Kennedy.)

 

22 Comments on Progfart Activist Judge Put In His Place By Justice Department

  1. Note to the “Never Trump” crowd. You were right, it IS about the judges, see your man Bush’s legacy right here.




    0
  2. Libs think they have “won” on this. They are over-the-top celebrating this because after Hillary’s crushing defeat they’ll take any “victory” over Trump they can.

    Wait until PRESIDENT Trump’s EO goes back into full-swing again soon. It will be election night demoralization all over again. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣




    0
  3. what does is take to get rid of an asshole like this. Impeachment? by who, congress? DOJ? Regardless this pos needs to be fired, one way or the other.




    0
  4. section 1182 (f) Immigration Law

    (f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
    Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.




    0
  5. Robart is not a conservative judge. That’s the very first spin the media proffered — that he was appointed by Bush. Technically, Robart was appointed under Bush’s administration, but the rules on that appointment deferred to state senators for choice and acceptance, and those senators were Murray and Cantwell. Murray is the one who placed his name in nomination.




    0
  6. Following the example set by Reid, Pelosi, and now Schumer, the left is automatically opposed to all issues supported by the Right. Zero consideration for cost/benefits ratio. Walls and fences are being put up all over the middle east to keep those worthless violent welfare rats out. But the dems want those votes, the hell with the cost.




    0
  7. He’s probably just overworked and should take some time off. Maybe a nice relaxing hunting trip to South Texas…Here’s your pillow!




    0
  8. New rule: judicial activist judges who rule unconstitutionally, or exceed their authority, or otherwise dishonor their Oath, are immediately:

    1. Permanently removed from office,
    2. and barred from any future Government employment of any kind,and
    3. Open to personal lawsuits and damages from any/all parties their unconstitutional rulings may have injured, with monetary damages, and
    4. Subject to arrest and criminal prosecution if they have “obstructed justice”, “interfered with lawful government ” or “violated the constitution”.

    It’s time there were penalties for these people.




    0
  9. So…….. Why doesn’t Donald J. “MAGA” Trump just do what Barry Soetero dba Barack H. 0bama did? You know, just IGNORE injunctions against his EOs? 0bama’s banning of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico was overturned, but his administration just ignored it and refused to issue any more permits.




    0
  10. this goof needs to be put on a SpaceX rocket and sent to mars where he can do his judge shit over that planet. i hear they have openings for his judginess up there. hell take the whole damn democratic party with him and sprinkle in all the friggin snowflakes. Pppffftt!!!




    0
  11. Curious: can a federal circuit court judge be transferred to another circuit? I’m thinking like the military, etc.

    If so, President Trump could break up the liberal stacked circuit, by assigning a judge where there is a need, maybe?

    Does anyone know?




    0
  12. So, the O-Blame-a administration came up with the target countries of concern – FBI, CIA, DHS, et.al – Trump uses his legal, Constitutional, statutory common sense to believe it & act upon it, Soros picks the right judge, who has NOT a single legal leg to stand on, places entire country at risk… WHAT could possibly go wrong?




    0
  13. LIBERAL BUSH FAMILY STRIKES AGAIN!

    I could have saved JEB! 100 million $, and told him not only will democrats NOT vote for him, the conservative Republicans also will NOT. He’s left with moderate / liberal Republican vote, and that’s it. What is that, 20%?

    ALL of the back-stabbing Bush family, including those big mouth liberal G.W.B. daughters are TRASH!




    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.