JTN: The Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral arguments Wednesday in Kari Lake’s election challenge, as a state Senate panel is hearing explosive allegations of 2022 election failures in Maricopa County, and the Democrat Secretary of State seeks to have Lake, the 2022 GOP nominee for governor, prosecuted for tweeting evidence from the public Senate hearings of mismatched ballot signatures.
The appeals court heard arguments in Lake’s appeal of a December decision in Maricopa County Superior Court rejecting her election lawsuit against county election officials and Gov. Katie Hobbs. Lake’s suit alleged that numerous irregularities in the 2022 gubernatorial election, including election machine issues in nearly 60% of the county’s 115 vote centers, effectively suppressed heavily Republican Election Day vote.
The court heard Lake’s case two days after she was separately referred for criminal prosecution by Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes to Attorney General Kris Mayes regarding a Lake tweet about Senate testimony on the improper counting of ballots with mismatched signatures.
“Today’s Senate Testimony CONFIRMS nearly 40,000 ballots illegally counted (10% of the signatures reviewed),” Lake tweeted on Jan. 23. “I think all the ‘Election Deniers’ out there deserve an apology.” MORE
If any good comes out of this, I’ll eat my hat
Justice is no longer part of American Society
They’re already working on a recall of Hobbs if the courts fail the people of Arizona. Look for it this Summer, it’ll be hot!
Recalls no work so well in California. The cheat the hell out of them too. What’s the resolution? I guess shut up and obey. I’m starting to feel like we need a shit load of Rowdy Roddy Piper’s special sun glasses.
That right there is John McCain’s legacy. That and practically burning an aircraft carrier to the water line.
Snooze fest. The more people just ignore this, the more outlandish the claims become. What no claims of foreign government envolvement yet?
The Secretary of State wants to prosecute Lake for disclosing evidence from a public hearing? Am I missing something here, or is this just the usual Democrat Modus Operandi?
The Dems will stonewall for a couple of weeks, then proclaim that it’s ‘old news’ after that.