Christie Defies Anti-Gun Lawmakers on Carry Improvements

New Jersey -(Ammoland.com)-This afternoon, Governor Christie announced that his administration has formally adopted his historic 2016 police regulations incrementally expanding right-to-carry to those facing serious threats, notwithstanding a series of procedural maneuvers by anti-gun lawmakers trying to kill those regulations since May of last year.

Outraged by even the slightest change empowering citizens to protect themselves, anti-gun lawmakers last year fast-tracked bills to kill the new regulations before they were even formally adopted. An obscure provision of the New Jersey Constitution allows the legislature to unilaterally invalidate regulations which conflict with legislative intent.

But the legislature has never expressed any intent over what precisely constitutes “justifiable need” to carry a handgun – that has been interpreted by the State Supreme Court, and the new Christie regulations are entirely consistent with that interpretation. Also, the legislature failed to comply with key technical requirements needed to invalidate the regulation, dooming their effort to failure.

more here

11 Comments on Christie Defies Anti-Gun Lawmakers on Carry Improvements

  1. WOW!! IS IT JUST ME OR IS IT HARD TO TELL ON ANY ONE DAY WHAT SIDE OF THE PLATE CHRISTIE IS GOING TO LINE UP ON??

  2. “those facing serious threats”

    Wow, it’s like it’s not even America. I really hope Trump addresses some of these states that don’t think Constitutional Rights apply to their residents. He can start with mine.

  3. Most people don’t know they are “facing a serious threat” until it happens. And then it is too late.

  4. Chrispy will always be Obola’s BFF to me.

    He enabled the muslim Jackal’s second term, how do you make amends for that?

  5. in·fringe·ment
    inˈfrinjmənt
    noun
    1.
    the action of breaking the terms of a law, agreement, etc.; violation.
    “copyright infringement”
    2.
    the action of limiting or undermining something.
    “the infringement of the right to keep and bear arms”

  6. National reciprocity makes sense, since 2A is a constitutionally enumerated right.

    Not complicated.

  7. “WOW!! IS IT JUST ME OR IS IT HARD TO TELL ON ANY ONE DAY WHAT SIDE OF THE PLATE CHRISTIE IS GOING TO LINE UP ON??”
    The side with waffles or pie.
    Oh wait, was that a baseball analogy?

Comments are closed.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!