Conclusion of Special Counsel Probe Puts Focus on Origins of FBI’s Investigation

Epoch Times: 

News Analysis

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s nearly two-year-long investigation concluded on March 22 with a report to Attorney General William Barr that recommended no further indictments.

“The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” the report states.

None of Mueller’s prior indictments involved collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The news confirms reporting by The Epoch Times over the past two years that there was no evidence to support the claim that Trump colluded with Russia.

Instead, serious questions have arisen about the origins of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, as well as the bureau’s use of politicized information in obtaining a FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmedlast week that his office is still investigating the potential FISA abuse by the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Andrew McCabe and the Start of the Mueller Probe

A crucial figure in the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

McCabe held meetings with the key people involved in the investigation, such as FBI agent Peter Strzok, outside of the regular chain of command, and was personally involved in the FBI’s FISA warrant application on Carter Page.

One of those meetings was described in the now infamous “insurance policy” text message in which Strzok described to Lisa Page—McCabe’s special counsel with whom Strzok was having an affair—a meeting that took place in “Andy’s” (McCabe’s) office:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office – that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

McCabe and Strzok had previously worked together at the FBI’s Washington Field Office. Just months after McCabe was transferred to headquarters, Strzok was transferred to rejoin McCabe to work on the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to send classified information.

McCabe’s actions as the acting FBI director also appear to have led to the appointment of the special counsel.

McCabe became acting director after Trump fired James Comey on May 9, 2017, at the recommendation of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Just two days later, McCabe testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in a pre-scheduled appearance. In his testimony, McCabe said there had been “no effort to impede our investigation to date.”

Yet despite McCabe’s statement that there had been no obstruction from the White House, he appears to have pursued opening an obstruction of justice investigation of Trump just days later. During a May 16 meeting with Rosenstein, McCabe reportedly tried to push “for the Justice Department to open an investigation into the president,” as relayed by a participant at the meeting to The Washington Post.

Rosenstein would meet later that same day with former FBI Director Robert Mueller and President Trump in the oval office, ostensibly as part of Mueller’s interview for the position of FBI director.

The next day, Rosenstein announced the appointment of Mueller as special counsel.

The special counsel probe, in essence, took away control of the investigation from the FBI under Acting Director McCabe and placed it in the hands of Mueller.

This was confirmed by the DOJ in a statement last month that read, “The deputy attorney general in fact appointed special counsel Robert Mueller, and directed that Mr. McCabe be removed from any participation in that investigation.”

This sequence of events was first reported by Epoch Times contributor Jeff Carlson in a Dec. 7, 2018, article.

The Steele Dossier

At the heart of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign was the so-called “Steele dossier” produced by Fusion GPS.  MORE HERE

9 Comments on Conclusion of Special Counsel Probe Puts Focus on Origins of FBI’s Investigation

  1. And let me be the first to say:
    I wanna see a minimum of 26 million hard-earned tax dollars spent on this, and a whole lot more if warranted, if it puts the real criminals behind bars!! I want to see this thorough, complete and followed through all the way!

    16
  2. ” recommended no further indictments”
    Comey could have done the same job in 2 weeks……..like he did for Clinton

    4
  3. @TRF
    Hey, why just these the liars? Do what they did to Trump’s family. Time to play by their rules. Make them feel the pain. It’s a teachable moment.

    8
  4. We are being told two things:

    1) We should just put all of this behind us. Sure it was an attempted soft coup but we need to heal . So the way to heal after an attempted soft coup is to allow those who attempted the soft coup to get away with it?

    2) Someone is like Eeyore for saying that nothing will happen to those responsible while we have seen Democrats get away with things like this for years. Why should we believe things will be different this time?

    2
  5. If the FISA abusers are not punished, then the swamp is still alive and stinking better than before. This should never be brushed off as a nothing burger so lets just go on down the road on our merry way as if it all never happened. Heads need to roll…soon!!!

    7
  6. @mcn^^^
    Plouffe…His name sounds like the sound a massive turd makes when splashing into the toilet bowl water.

    1
  7. Jethro – Kinda the same analogy with Donny Deutsch.
    The name sounds like the collision of a vinegar truck hitting a water tanker.
    Doooooosh!

Comments are closed.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!