FBI gives Congress intel on alleged Chinese plot to create fake mail-in ballots in 2020 – IOTW Report

FBI gives Congress intel on alleged Chinese plot to create fake mail-in ballots in 2020

Just the News: FBI Director Kash Patel on Monday evening turned over to Congress an intelligence report raising concerns that China had mass-produced fake U.S. driver’s licenses to carry out a scheme to hijack the 2020 election with fake mail-in ballots for Democrat Joe Biden.

The newly declassified intelligence reports from August 2020 weren’t corroborated or fully investigated and instead were recalled from intelligence agencies at about the time that then-FBI Director Chris Wray testified there were no known plots of foreign interference ahead of the 2020 election in which Biden defeated Donald Trump, officials told Just the News. MORE

11 Comments on FBI gives Congress intel on alleged Chinese plot to create fake mail-in ballots in 2020

  1. Lets coverup what really happened and blame it all on China. See, the FBI had nothing to do with the election fraud. We write the intelligence report so you don’t have to.

    2
  2. Did China stop the vote counting, only in the handful of swing states, where Trump was ahead at 10 pm and waaaayyy behind the next morning? Because while there were many factors and contributions to the cheat, ultimately that was the crucial one.

    5
  3. Another distraction created by the FBi regarding uncorroborated or fully investigated claim China was to attempt to hijack the 2020 election with fake mail-in ballots for Democrat Joe Biden.

    Epstein, JFK and MLK files have yet to be declassified and provided to the public.

    More distractions coming soon.

    5
  4. And don’t forget the rigged Dominion vote counting machines that were programmed to aletr votes from republican to democrat. All told, I’d guess there were at least 20 million illegal votes counted.

    4
  5. FBI says, There was, indeed, a grain of truth to the assassin Guiteau’s claim “the doctors killed President Garfield, I just shot him.” But this odd and disgusting medical history requires a more nuanced clarification of Charles Guiteau’s claim.

    Charles Guiteau drew an ivory-handled .44 caliber pistol, which he carefully selected thinking it would look good in a museum later on and fired at the President. The first shot hit his elbow, while the second shot made its way in his back. In his mind, the President had wronged him, and Guiteau believed “Garfield’s death was needed to save the country”.

    Focused on finding and removing the bullet, many doctors stuck their unwashed fingers in the wound and probed around, all for naught and without applying the numbing power of ether anesthetic.

    President Garfield was taken back to the White House where the medical treatment truly became brutal. Still hellbent on finding and removing the bullet. The doctors tortured the president with more digital probing and many surgical attempts to widen the three-inch deep wound into a 20-inch-long incision, beginning at his ribs and extending to his groin. It soon became a super-infected, pus-ridden, gash of human flesh. After nearly 90 days of excruciating pain President Garfield died.
    Dirty Doctors Finished What an Assassin’s Bullet Started.

    In recent years, a wave of revisionist historians has taken Garfield’s doctors to task for not applying any sterile techniques, and, thus, saving the President’s life.

    The FBI, much like with Fauci, exonerated the medical doctor’s incompetence in the death of President Garfield.
    “Charles Guiteau was a righteous execution.”

    Why did Charles Guiteau shoot President Garfield?
    Was it While a member of the House of Representatives, Garfield had supported the abolition of slavery and praised the passage of the 15th Amendment granting black men the right to vote, and as president, he continued to advocate for civil rights. He proposed government-funded education to improve the lives of African Americans, especially in the South, and appointed several blacks to prominent federal positions, including Frederick Douglass as the District of Columbia recorder of deeds and Blanche Bruce as Register of the Treasury?

    Or was it, as reported, Charles Guiteau felt slighted for not being appointed to a “Patronage” position?

    Reading the reports of the day, the FBI has no definite determination.
    Much like the investigations of JFK, RFK, MLK and Epstein, in 150 years there will be many unanswered questions due to failed investigations and redacted testimony.

    2

Comments are closed.