I do not use “mansplain” disparagingly. Quite the opposite. I think it’s a good word, because it bothers feminists more to be educated by men than women.
18 Comments on Guy Mansplains To Women Why Men Got To Vote Before Women
Comments are closed.
iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.
In a perfect world, single people would get one vote each. Then married couples would get only one vote, so they would have to discuss what is good for the family.
BTW: A woman once told me she thought is was sexy to have a man explain things to her. I like that!
Let’s hear Kamalarkey ‘splain it.
Factually correct, inartfully explained.
Not sure if entirely correct. I don’t think all men were able to vote at first. I think it was mostly property and land owners who got to vote first. Could be wrong though.
@Jason
That is asinine.
You’d wind up with a government, further, driven by the idea of destroying the family because families would get out-voted >2:1.
Let’s reverse your bizarre statement and propose that everyone gets a vote, but married couples get a third “family” vote. You’d wind up with fake couples who are only it for the power; further eroding family values in the government.
Who made Ben Shapiro the arbiter of everything?
Yes, at first only property owners could vote.
Most of those were men.
I believe at first only white land owning men were allowed to vote.
For some womensplaining, women far too often vote on emotions and looks. Sadly in this screwed up country we live in now so do far too many men because men have been feminized. Heck some of them don’t even realize they are a man.
Truly though we’re past all of that now, voting no longer matters. That’s why I no longer say as I’ve said for years that I would give up my right to vote to stop all the stupid women from voting.
81 million voted, what’s wrong who votes in fraudulent elections in the eyes of a politician as long as they win, and no one is allowed to examining as to the method used. Only in America.
I have always believed that in the current situation we are in, if you don’t pay taxes, you don’t get to vote.
That is why it’s totally irresponsible to allow those with no skin in the game to vote as well. Allowing anyone who is taking a dime in government assistance or not contributing anything to vote is a recipe for disaster.
I am a woman, but am so unimpressed by the intelligence of most of the women whom I have met.
When I was a young teen-ager in the mid-60’s, our father introduced me to the novels of Nevil Shute. He wrote about Australia quite a bit. In one of the novels (I do not know if this is true), Australia had a system of multiple votes. First, everyone had the vote (unless you were in jail). Then if you owned property, another vote, owned a business, another vote, was a veteran or member of the military, another vote. The premise was that each individual (whether man or woman) had votes based on how much “skin in the game” they had. I always liked that idea.
If voting actually mattered they wouldn’t allow it.
Rid government of its power over every aspect of life, all money, etc and elections no longer have a serious impact on anyone. Find the root cause and problems can be eliminated.
Because for about 4 days out of every 28, women are irrational?
The women in that video are annoying with their facial expressions đŸ™„signaling they are locking their minds down to listening to what he has to say, right or wrong. Shapiro, too.
Mike N
Who cares who runs the government. Our world system is mastered by Satan anyway. I’m talking about families and couples attitudes. One vote would take the individuality out of the home. Perfect in my opinion.
Women in our Western states could vote before suffrage. Read a book and educate yourselves.