Jordan Peterson hammers SJW in interview, gets called a misogynist bully

Breitbart: Jordan Peterson’s must-watch takedown of SJW media maven Cathy Newman has gone viral, with over 2 million views on YouTube.

If you haven’t read my previous piece on the interview, shame on you! At least watch at least a few minutes of the video to get a sense of the totality of Peterson’s triumph.

Now, predictably, the left-wing media is trying to reframe Newman’s abject humiliation as a case of misogynist bullying by the “alt-right.” The aim, of course, is to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by implying that anyone who takes the side of Newman’s critics is anti-women and pro-abuse.

According to the Guardian:

Channel 4 News has called in security specialists to analyse threats made to presenter Cathy Newman following her interview with a controversial Canadian psychologist who has attracted a following among the “alt-right.”

Ben de Pear, the editor of Channel 4 News, said Newman had been subjected to “vicious misogynistic abuse”. Having to call in security specialists was a “terrible indictment of the times we live in”, he said.

“Security specialists.” Really? Speaking as a Channel 4 shareholder — as I guess all British subjects are, being as the channel is publicly owned — I’d be interested to see how solid the evidence is to warrant these drastic and presumably costly measures.

Does de Pear, I wonder, mean any of these?  more here

20 Comments on Jordan Peterson hammers SJW in interview, gets called a misogynist bully

  1. I listened to this video. Man that woman is a bitch. Would say “so you are saying women are” and then put words in his mouth, then not let him respond.
    He did a great job though.
    Very tedious.

  2. The first I have heard of Jordan Peterson or Cathy Newman.

    I was impressed by the former using data, reason, evidence and facts and disheartened by the latter for her use of baseless allegations and irrational social justice arguments.

    I was embarrassed for Newman employing the emotional, tactless rewording of Mr. Peterson’s answers to make him out to be something he had proven he was not.

  3. Peterson has the patience if a saint. What an unpleasant, man-hating hag that woman is. If she would shut up and let him talk she might actually learn something.

  4. Jp is about as polite as a person can be. Intelligent,well thought out points are now bullying. We live in a shit world.

  5. Peterson destroyed her
    for the whole 29 minutes.
    At least she let him speak
    and finish most of the time.I have
    to give her credit for that.Could you imagine
    Sheboon Reid from MSLSDNBC doing the interview???

  6. I watched this a few days ago and I must say I would have jumped across the table and strangled that woman to death and declared “There, I’ve made the world a better place by getting rid of you, you ill-tempered B-I-T-C-H!”

  7. So what YOU’RE saying is, is that you are going to summarize my well-thought-out responses into short clips of negativity and then claim you’re not doing it.

    That’s what I wish he would set her up with…

  8. She didn’t seem capable of comprehending his arguments. The more she questioned, the more frustrated she became. She couldn’t digest factual data dispassionately and her thinking was emotionally driven. Her view won’t change irregardless of the facts because she is deeply invested in her orthodoxy.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!