Michael Flynn Judge Could Be Disqualified From Proceedings After Hearing Today

Bongino:

We’re not sure what took them so long, but some on a full federal appeals court are concerned about Emmet Sullivan’s bias in the Kafkaesque Michael Flynn case.

Ronald Reagan famously quipped that the closest thing we’ll ever see resembling eternity on this Earth is a government program – but it’s safe to say that “the Michael Flynn trial” also qualifies.

After the Department of Justice announced that they would be dropping their criminal case against Flynn in May, Judge Sullivan appointed an outsider to serve as an amicus curaae to present arguments against the DOJ’s motion to dismiss. The man, John Gleeson, without a hint of irony blasted the DOJ’s motion as a “gross abuse” of power. Two weeks after that a federal appeals court ordered Sullivan to grant the DOJ’s request to drop charges against Flynn. A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals approved Flynn’s petition to intervene in the case after a district court judge had tapped an outside counsel to argue against the DOJ’s move.  In response, Sullivan appealed to the Circuit Court for an en banc hearing, and oral arguments were scheduled for August 11th, which are going on as I write.

more here

18 Comments on Michael Flynn Judge Could Be Disqualified From Proceedings After Hearing Today

  1. Sullivan’s so crooked he makes a beer pretzel look like a straight-edge. As to the Board? Only one fast decision can prove they arent the same as he is.

    27
  2. The DC appeals court has a choice:

    1. Be total cunts about it for the “good” of the party, and be rebuked by the SCOTUS over it later.

    2. Follow the obvious fucking law and send that cocksucker Sullivan to the dugout.

    38
  3. While BLM is out ranting about justice for George Floyd, not a peep from anyone on justice for Flynn as a black judge tries to rail road him. Ain’t that sweet???

    39
  4. DEMOCRAT UNCLE TOM ALERT:

    Emmet Sullivan should stop and return to the democrat plantation from which he comes.

    14
  5. Unfortunately, being DQ’d carries no penalties. He needs to be personally sanctioned. Paying for all of Flynn’s legal expenses since the DOJ first moved to dismiss would be a good start.

    26
  6. I am somewhat doubtful that they will remove him. Why would they approve an en bac hearing in the first place if they didn’t think they might have enough on the court to let him continue?

    I know the judiciary is supposed to be impartial and follow the letter of the law. Rats, who am I kidding? I couldn’t keep a straight face typing that last sentence.

    17
  7. Sullivan is like an animal that’s sunk his teeth in and tasted blood now he’s crazed for the kill.
    There’s only one solution for the situation and that’s to dispatch the cur.

    11
  8. Not a chance. If you heard that speculation on hypothetical nonsense from the court, you know how it is that this assh*le got his foot in the door to screw Flynn. Unbelievable.

    9
  9. it’s not over until the fat lady sings.

    and unfortunately the initial back & forth indicates that the Democrat-appointed Judges are ALL IN for turning this into a Kangaroo Court and sticking it to Flynn & Powell.

    The hacks on the Appeals Court got their marching orders from the Deep State and now they’re Just Following Orders like the good little National Socialists that they are. Despicable.

    When not if this goes to the SCOTUS I can see Roberts getting blackmailed again by the Deep State and he’ll vote 5-4 against Flynn along with the Socialists Breyer, Sotomajor, Kagel-Exercise, and GinsBORG.

    But at least Flynn knows he’ll get a full aprdon from Trump as Trump’s big F.U. to the clearly compromised SCOTUS.

    6
  10. I’d be more excited if the words “could be disqualified” in the title were instead “has been disqualified”. But expectations are low for that happening.

    6
  11. I think i read it’s a majority dem appointees on that court.

    That’s all you need to know.

    8

Comments are closed.