…But you can still see headlights.
Look at those headlights!
The new March issue of Playboy is the first one without full-frontal nudity, but it does feature something that the 63-year-old magazine has not had in decades: auto advertising.
…But you can still see headlights.
Look at those headlights!
The new March issue of Playboy is the first one without full-frontal nudity, but it does feature something that the 63-year-old magazine has not had in decades: auto advertising.
Comments are closed.
iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.
It shouldn’t make any difference, because if you ask anybody, they’ll tell you they only read it for the articles (koff, koff).
Right…?
🙂
“…But you can still see headlights.”
Yea but no high beams.
I think they said no FRONTAL nudity. Photo #2 did not need to be covered!
So now we do car research in Playboy and surf porn at the library. I love this new Progressive Puritanism.
On a related note, KFC will no longer sell fried chicken…
I think the Vegas over/under on the magazine folding is six months.
I guarantee the Publix supermarket will NOT carry Playboy no matter what.
I read an article in Playboy. Once. A long time ago. And maybe not the whole thing.
My whole youth was a waste…
I loved that magazine!
(when I was 13)
I remember as a kid, Grandpa’s Playboys were hid, but National Geographic was chock full nude women and out on the coffee table. It even had the money shots that Playboy didn’t post back then.
Yes, but with National Geographic and those jungle women, I grew up thinking a woman’s tits should be hanging down to their waist…
LBS
They don’t?
So you thought everyone had Yoko Ono’s Deflated Divebombing Hindenbergs? Sad.
But seriously, I had a relative who worked for Playboy about 10 years ago and she signed me and a bunch of family members up for subscriptions. (True story!)
I seriously could not believe the editorial slant. It was knee-jerk liberalism for imbeciles. And the editors clearly thought that the liberals they were targeting WERE reading the articles!
So they covered up the women with fake boobs but they still went to the likes of that Rachel Maddow guy for “content”.
Fail.
Irony, Hustler magazine was filled with the worse republican/conservative bashing I have ever seen.
Like their clientele actually gave a shit.
They also had the most racist, vile cartoons you would ever see.
Of course they were good liberals, so no harm or foul…
Playboy model Katie May took the news hard:
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/02/05/model-katie-may-dead-at-34-according-to-multiple-reports/
So I guess the only reason to buy it is for the in depth reviews on stereophonic equipment.
@Moxie Man: Any word on where they might be keeping her body until the funeral? Just asking – um, – for a friend. I mean, he might want to pay his respects…or maybe just out of curiosity. You know?
?
Perhaps they are just preparing for sharia law?
A ten yr old male, bent-over centerfold?
@Lazlo
Dennis Prager would approve.
This is 1985 all over again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Coke