Frontpage Magazine
Well the low turnout has been confirmed. Less than 30% of Democrats voted in the party’s mayoral primary [for New York City]. Of those 43% supposedly voted for [Zohran] Mamdani. (Ranked choice voting also makes this whole thing more complicated, but I’m keeping it simple.)
As I note in my upcoming article, “56% of registered voters in the city are Democrats so some 7.2% of city residents voted for him. New York City has a population of 8.2 million. Of those 432,305 or 5% voted for Mamdani.”
You can go with the 7% figure which represents voters, but either way this is far from the massive sweep of the city that the media is hyping.
Most New Yorkers didn’t vote for Mamdani. Even most Democrats stayed home. More
City folks have the right to choose their leaders; let the chips fall where they may.
Demoncraps – They LIE, CHEAT and STEAL. That’s WHO THEY are.
This is sooooo deliciously conflicting chisle writing style.
Slowly chiselling away society, bit by bit, brick by brick.
@Odin
Big NO-O’O-PE! on that as NYC has been at/near bankruptcy at least once (1975) and under the “too big to fail” philosophy/sophistry of the Left and RINOs would be bailed out by the federal government.
I think England has a law that says “none of the Above” can win an election and the election is re-run and the parties have to put new names on the ballots. We should have that.
How about Alfred E Newman, he’s been running for political office since 1956 or so. And he’s more eminently qualified than all the democrap losers. Why the hell not.
If NOTA was a REAL option on the ballot, and if NOTA won, NONE of the candidates would be allowed in the do-over, our election outcomes would change DRAMATICALLY. In this case, a choice between an elder mass murderer and a Muslim Communist, was no real choice at all. The Libertarian Party has ALWAYS included NOTA on EVERY BALLOT with the above provisions and conditions.
I think most people looked at Mamdani and thought they were voting for Billy Mays.
I was pulling for…..
“Not Sure”……😈
So because most Democrats were too lazy to vote in the primary a radical Islamic won.
smh