Show Me State Governor Indicted For Sharing Nude Pics Of Mistress


Missouri Governor Eric Greitens (R-MO) was arraigned yesterday in St. Louis on charges of “felony invasion of privacy charge for allegedly taking and transmitting a non-consensual photo of his partly nude lover.”  More

Greitens’ Wiki page states that the governor served as lieutenant commander in the SEALS earning numerous decorations. He also changed parties before running for governor.

The photo at issue was allegedly taken by Greitens when he had a “Fifty Shades of Gray” -like romp with his stylist in 2015. The yet to be Governor then threatened the woman with exposure of the photos if the story of their tryst ever got out.

16 Comments on Show Me State Governor Indicted For Sharing Nude Pics Of Mistress

  1. Dang it! I thought there would be nekid pictures……… Ms. Kormann would do.

    “Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act.” Geo. Orwell

  2. STOOPID is as STOOPID does. That’s how we lost a good congressman here in Tim Murphy. And now HIS mistress, is running for congress in MY district – AS a Republican!!! 😮 😮 😮

    Mike Doyle is a thunderous TURD of a CONgressman, but I’m not voting for mistress psychodingbat either. Looks like I’m writing my wife’s name in on the ballot… AGAIN… 😕

  3. And the jerk is acting all righteous because ‘it was before I was governor’ (did he disclose this when he ran for office?) and ‘the affair was consensual’.

    I want the girl to find the biggest baddest new boyfriend out there and let him have 15 minutes to beat the snot out of this ‘public servant’.

  4. If he would have stayed a democrat there would be no problem. The “mistress” is of the legal age of consent so he is not exchanging freaky pics with minors (the Wiener). He did not “rape/rape or even just “rape” her. (I’m still hazy on the difference but as I loath Whoppi I’ll just remain hazy on that; listening to her makes me feel as if I’ve been ‘raped’ or ‘raped/raped’ depending on which medication that old hag is on today). And there is no kinky picture for proof. For all we know he just made a flash so she would think he took a picture but either way it’s like a tree falling in the woods- if a picture was taken but no one has ever seen it does it really exist? She claims that he told her if she ever breaths a word of this the photo would be everywhere. Well she is talking- where is the photo?

    What I’m driving at is if he was still a democrat these are level of wrong doing and questions that news editors would ask and conclude there is not enough evidence to justify publishing the story. They’d say something like ‘let the National Enquirer run that filth; we are a respected NEWS source’.

  5. Let’s be fair, here.

    Would the type of mind that, seeing an opportunity for a “little strange” that might come back to “haunt”, so keep it in your pants, be willing to play “grab ass” and “back scratch” with the legislature? Or would the type of mind that’s willing to play “grab ass” and “back scratch” with the legislature, on seeing an opportunity for a “little strange” that might come back to “haunt”, devise a plan to extort “future enemies”?

    People willing to deliver unto The Party their just reward, are not going to play “let’s make a deal” while waiting.

  6. I’m wondering what this guy was like before running for governor. Seems well thought out that he’d insist on security photos before fooling around and he had been divorced. Big disappointment.

  7. Bill and Hilary Clinton, Podesta, Carville and their other slimy enablers dragged our Republic down to this.

    You don’t even have to honey-trap these morons.

    They honey trap themselves.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!