Trump Floats Idea of Do-Over on Truth Social – IOTW Report

Trump Floats Idea of Do-Over on Truth Social

So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION  in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!” – Donald Trump

Red State’s Streiff ddi not like Trump’s statement.

Read here


24 Comments on Trump Floats Idea of Do-Over on Truth Social

  1. There is no voting our way out of the mess at this point. The Republican establishment and Democrat Party are completely wedded to extra legal voting and out and out vote fraud and election theft. Both are unfit for participation in a representative republic and there is no getting along with them.

    15
  2. He also posted this.

    “UNPRECEDENTED FRAUD REQUIRES UNPRECEDENTED CURE!”
    Which we better start real soon because they own EVERYTHING.

    10
  3. Today we woke up knowing which of the establishment Republicans were colluding with Democrats to violate the First Amendment and violate their Oath of Office. It is each and every single one of them that did not step to the microphones yesterday and demand rigorous investigation and prosecution of any elected or appointed officials who had anything to do with efforts by Twitter in violating the civil rights of American citizens.

    What this indicates to me is we are living under the whims of an occupying regime made up of self appointed elites. Such an arrangement is extra Constitutional and illegitimate.

    13
  4. ^^^^^^^
    Well George, even Democrats like being able to afford Christmas presents. And that’s exactly why he will hold office again.

    5
  5. JD
    “What this indicates to me is we are living under the whims of an occupying regime made up of self appointed elites”

    Of course we are. And a lot of the decisions and directions are made from people living of foreign countries.

    5
  6. Do over is that a total rebuild of Truth Social? Would he claim bankruptcy before or after this do over. 3 casino bankrupt is the 4th time the charmer?

  7. Is president aware of Brunson vs Adams 22-380 on the Supreme Court docket? This case when heard could gut Congress.388 members violated their oath of office and it seems to be a rock solid case that they did. They can be removed from office and any action after that vote will be illegitimate

    9
  8. Explaining 22-380 further. 147 members of Congress wanted to investigate fraud. The vote not to investigate put those members on the side of the alleged fraudsters. Therefore not defending the Constitution from those who would destroy it with an illegitimate election. Pretty cut and dried. The media needs to get this out there.

    IOTW could go a long way in doiung just that.

    3
  9. Boy the left and the rhinos have their hair on fire over this thing?
    Funny how they have no concern of the massive physical, video evidence and statistical evidence of the fraud?
    Communist kill everything they touch and create misery for everybody.

    3
  10. Anonymous
    DECEMBER 4, 2022 AT 3:08 PM
    “Is president aware of Brunson vs Adams 22-380 on the Supreme Court docket?”

    Moot.

    NEXT!

  11. Let’s face it, everyone: Biden just might be the final president of what we know as a 50-state “America”. Secession is likely, if not desirable. Who’d you want as a first leader of a breakaway America? I’d want Trump.

    2
  12. Could mister moot explain himself. Defending the Constitution is never moot, The Constitution says it is not. The document protects itself.

  13. SC not hearing Brunson v. Adams until January 5, 2023. Much could change by then but still an important case.

    1
  14. Texan can you source that information? And what would change. Will it be permissibly to dishonor your oath of office?

  15. Anonymous
    DECEMBER 4, 2022 AT 5:08 PM
    “Could mister moot explain himself.”

    We are your rulers.

    We don’t have to explain ANYTHING.

    You could ask your January 6th buddies how that works, if we ever let them see the light of day again.

    You could easily be…

    NEXT!

    1
  16. What would happen if Mike Lindell (or fill in the blank) became the head of a new party? The MAGA Party? Though, named something else that will endure. It’s been over 100 years since the Republican party was born — and it came into existence also at a time of extreme civil strife, primarily over states’ rights and slavery. We’ve more reasons than they had at that time to proceed.

    Or, would there be too many RINO or lofo Republican voters who would split the vote?

  17. I meant Lindell as the counterpoint to that Romney relative who runs the RNC. Trump would be the official head of the party, of course.

  18. They have to explain why they sided with alleged fraudsters when they voted not to investigate. I do not think you know anything about the Constitution. Next is not necessary because you have already disqualified yourself from any intelligent conversation.

    1

Comments are closed.