UK Supreme Court Rules a ‘Woman’ Refers to Biological Sex – IOTW Report

UK Supreme Court Rules a ‘Woman’ Refers to Biological Sex

And a Tranny Is Not a Woman by Definition.

13 Comments on UK Supreme Court Rules a ‘Woman’ Refers to Biological Sex

  1. I’m surprised that some sanity is coming from today’s Britan.

    But, we’ll take it and pray that it spreads to the rest of the world, especially here in the US!

    Now. If Starmer listens to the sanity spoken by JD Vance about allowing free speech in Briton, things just might be moving in God’s favor!

    15
  2. Sorry but the annoying word quibbler is here again.

    Is there a kind of “sex” that’s not “biological”? No. “Sex” is a reproductive role, and there are only two. (No one will be confused in context that you might be referring to an activity.)

    “Biological sex” is a redundancy. (No one will be confused in context wondering if you meant wild sex, dirty sex, make-up sex, kinky sex, or whatever.)

    Please don’t let the propagandists change language!

    It’s “sex”. Not “biological sex”. Not “gender”.

    6
  3. Sadly, if this went before the SCOTUS, it’s a certainty that 3 women justices would vote to erase their own sex from legal recognition with a 50/50 chance of all 4 women justices voting to erase it. And depending on what Justice Roberts’ blackmailers want that week, it could be legally declared in the US that women don’t really exist except per personal declaration.

    And just like that, women’s sports would become mediocre male faggots sports. And women’s locker rooms would become pervert flashing parlors.

    9
  4. mystaclean — Uh huh. They’re also called transvestites.

    I hope, when the real studies are pursued, it is made clear from them that there are a lot of men who are not “transgenders”, but just like wearing women’s undergarments as a form of autogynophelia (sp?), a sexual fetish. I feel I need a shower after just writing the word.

    2
  5. I am completely dumbfounded
    The UK actually declarered a woman is a person with XX Chromosomes
    I’m waiting for the political shits to say they need to re-define X and Y chromanones,

Comments are closed.