Fake News Claims Donald Trump Jr. in legal danger for Russia meeting – IOTW Report

Fake News Claims Donald Trump Jr. in legal danger for Russia meeting

TheLastTradition:

These guys never learn! These piece of tripe by Politico is all about the headline.  When you read the article, if you’re bored to death, there isn’t much to it other than sensationalizing a nothing burger of a story.

Politico reports Donald Trump Jr. is in a legal danger zone following his acknowledgment that he met during the heat of the 2016 presidential campaign with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin ties who offered to deliver damaging information about Hillary Clinton.  MORE

11 Comments on Fake News Claims Donald Trump Jr. in legal danger for Russia meeting

  1. Someone like Limbaugh needs to speculate that the Seth Rich hit anniversary email drop was done by Russia. Maybe that might get some mention of it in the media, but I doubt it.

  2. Speaking of “detectives” let’s talk about Woodward and Bernstein. Spare me from these two and their phychophants in the media! With all the democRat ratfuckery going on since Watergate, surely there was ONE story they could have broken in 40 years!
    Where were they during all the years of sexual misconduct as Governor of Arkasas?
    Where were they during the years of Clinton criminal conduct during the 90s?
    Where were they to report the Clinton body count that mysteriously stopped in 2000 and resumed again in 2016?
    Where were they during the past eight years of a Taqiyah Sunrise-Drinking Marxist Muzlim Mallard intertwined with yet more Clinton criminality with our nation’s secrets?
    Did they NOT have the freedom of the press to investigate the mis-use of the IRS against political enemies?
    Did they NOT have the freedom of the press to investigate the use of the EPA as a weapon against industry?
    And how about exposing CIA surveilence on Americans (and the Press), or the rise of terrorism on the Øbamboozler´s watch due to his arming and funding of terrorists and terrorism?
    Did they NOT have the freedom of the press to call out the fact that the Øbamboozler refused use the term iSlamic Terrorism?

    AWOL! That where they’ve been!

    Not a peep outta them for over 40 years because they didn’t dare move the refrigerator to expose all their fellow cockroaches hiding behind it lest they be ostricized! The Media deliberately provokes and covers left wing, violent rallies and riots, carefully interviewing, showing select hand carried signs with their catchy slogans in tacit support of Anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, Globalists, Soros backed Socialist/progressive democrats, communists, racist BLM and ANTIFA radical anarchists, but they’ll trot (Trotsky) out these two old Gaslighters who can´t find any of it with both hands and a flashlight!
    Detectives? Puuuuleeeeze!

  3. Blah blah blah, the press is so desperate to find something they’re tripping over their dicks. Pair a second rate education with a second rate mind and the results are cnn. etc. What a collection of hapless buffoons.

  4. Russian lawyer says she never had any dirt on Clinton and never actually says she was asked for it…NBC assumes it and asks her about it. Trump Jr continues to indicate dirt was offered by someone. See Drudge.

  5. It’s crucial to keep in mind, I think, that the purveyors of Fake News don’t “report” any of this stuff because they, themselves, believe what they are saying. They don’t. That’s already been established by O’Keefe. No. This is merely a good old-fashioned Yellow Journalism smear campaign. You know, retraction on page 36 of the NYT’s, zero response to Project Veritas’ undercover revelations, etc. All of this is being done simply to smear the Trump administration. These guys know the general public will not question anything they heard on the tee vee. That’s how Wa-hon Williams was able to repeat for nearly an entire year that a black congressman was spit on and why stupid D’s still believe Palin said she could see Russia from her back porch.

    They know what they are saying isn’t true, but that’s not the goal of Fake News. The focus is all wrong; they shouldn’t be argued against on the face of their claims, but on why they persist in promoting their Fake News. No one is asking that question.

Comments are closed.