Frontpage Mag:
The war of letters began when 22 countries penned a letter to the United Nations Human Rights Council condemning China’s treatment of Uighurs and “other Muslim and minorities communities.”
The letter in defense of Muslim Uighurs in Xinjiang was signed by France, Germany, Canada, Sweden and 18 other, mostly Western and European, countries. The case of the missing Muslim signatories was solved when the People’s Republic of China fired back with its own letter signed by 37 countries.
This letter in defense of China’s crackdown on Islam was signed by 16 Muslim countries.
While some of the Muslim signatories were drawn from African countries, the letter was also signed by ambassadors for the leading Arab governments including Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Syria, and Kuwait. Pakistan, the world’s second largest Muslim country, also signed on.
While Western governments wailed about Muslim human rights in China, the leading Sunni nations of the world signed off on a letter praising “China’s remarkable achievements in the field of human rights.” Mandatory abortions, organ harvesting and the mass murder of millions are remarkable achievements.
No doubt about it.
The world’s top Muslim governments didn’t just settle for abstract praise of China’s human rights. Instead they explicitly defended China’s crackdown on Muslims in Xinjiang.
“Faced with the grave challenge of terrorism and extremism, China has undertaken a series of counter-terrorism and de-radicalization measures in Xinjiang, including setting up vocational education and training centers,” the letter reads. “The past three consecutive years has seen not a single terrorist attack in Xinjiang and people there enjoy a stronger sense of happiness, fulfillment and security.”
The war of letters humiliated Western governments which had failed to convince a single Muslim country to sign on to a letter criticizing China’s crackdown on Muslims. And they humiliated the Muslim signatories who demonstrated that China could intimidate them into endorsing a crackdown on Islam.
The People’s Republic of China’s idea of de-radicalization measures had allegedly included forcing Muslims to drink alcohol and eat pork, a ban on beards, hijabs and the name Mohammed. more here
China is helping Islam do its dirty work.
Muslims enslave other muslims.
They don’t care.
So when China fights muslim terrorism that’s great. But when the U.S. fights muslim terrorism we’re the racist great satan.
The saving grace of there being both Communism and hordes of Chinese, is that Islam won’t convert or destroy them in 1000 years.
I can only hope they have their own 911 so that they will spread out like a hive of bees and crush Islam. Who would stop them? Who would want to?
There are no flags but ours anymore.
Out among the great unwashed, there is only power, those who have it, and those who don’t.
The American Left is tarred with the same brush. Their craven, do anything, say anything manner smacks directly of Communist Bastardy.
“The saving grace of there being both Communism and hordes of Chinese, is that Islam won’t convert or destroy them in 1000 years.”
They still work for the same boss.
This tells you all you need to know about the dietary prohibitions the theiving Mohammedans fecklessly stole from Judaism. It’s nothing but a behavior modification and control tool that they don’t REALLY believe in for the stated religious purposes.
The Uighurs, being prohibited from naming their kids Mohammad, maybe ought to start naming newborns Mousie Dung, or Chink, or Velly Solly, or No Tickee.
“The Uighurs …”
Is that pronounced “Wiggers?”
izlamo delenda est …