Even though 0bamaCare is on life support it’s the same as being alive. We all know Obama wants a single-payer system and he’s probably not going to get it by January. The problem for Obama is he can’t get exactly what he wanted. But a bigger problem for us is Hillary. If she’s elected, the plug will be pulled on 0bamaCare and single-payer will be born. In the meantime, we all suffer. And I don’t care for that.
#NEVERHILLARY
———-
PJ: Over at The Motley Fool, Sean Williams has a lengthy analysis of ObamaCare’s many woes, but the meat of the matter comes down to two things — a lack of money and a lack of healthy paying customers.
Obamacare was expected to enroll 21 million new people by the end of 2016, at least according to projections from the Congressional Budget Office in 2013. Currently, this figure is about 10 million shy of the CBO’s projections from three years ago, and it could fall further as attrition due to non-payment continues. Having fewer enrollees than initially expected is certainly not an ideal picture for insurers when the margins associated with Obamacare enrollees are typically much narrower than through other forms of enrollment. The smaller scale will likely only hurt profitability.Obamacare enrollees have also tended to be a costlier, sicker group of individuals. According to a large analysis conducted by the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Obamacare enrollees cost, on average, 22% more per month than persons enrolled in an employer-sponsored health plan. This probably isn’t too much of a shock considering that prior to Obamacare there were rules in place that allowed insurers to turn away people with pre-existing conditions. Under Obamacare, insurers can’t do this anymore, meaning sicker individuals have been among the first to enroll, leaving insurers with an adverse patient pool.
The risk corridor has also been an utter failure.
You were warned, repeatedly, before ObamaCare was even signed into law, that its perverse incentives would lead to a insurance pool too small and too old and too sick to be sustainable. So other than another “I told you so,” there really isn’t much to add to the first and second paragraphs.
Now about that “utter failure” of a risk corridor…
We discussed those here a few weeks back, about how they made innovation “punishable by being forced to turn your money over to less efficient competitors.” And if there’s one thing at which ObamaCare is increasingly successful, it’s punishing innovation. For yet another example, we now go to New Mexico:
A New Mexico health insurer is suing the Obama administration, claiming rules implemented under the Affordable Care Act require the insurer to pay millions annually to a competitor, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of New Mexico, whose parent company sits on nearly $10 billion in reserves.“This regulatory dystopia is the equivalent of forcing the local baker who sells cupcakes to neighborhood coffee shops to pay between 14 percent and 22 percent of his revenue to Nabisco,” says the complaint filed Friday by New Mexico Health Connections. MORE
Obama is only following the Marxist Alinsky ideology:
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
I sure hope Obamacare doesn’t sink before Obama gets me that $2,500 premium reduction he promised me.
“The risk corridor has also been an utter failure.” This is why none of it works. Shifting the whole to compensate for a part is ridiculous. Obamacare chose “everyone must have at least” in options. The young don’t need “all that” and they aren’t opting in. It is cheaper to pay the penalty.
If Obamacare was furniture maker the chairs would be offered with one leg made of rotted wood.
Trump says repeal it. Then what?
I’m not saying not to. I’m really asking.
They all said “Repeal and replace with something that works”. Problem is, nothing the government replace it with will work. I wish Trump would say “Repeal and let the market work like it will”.
These Marxist fucktards need to be dealt with like the vermin they are. Eradicated.
Herd,
Open season no limit Marxist hunting license works for me.