WyBlog: The homofascists enlisted the Supreme Court to redefine marriage. And now Madam Justice “Wise Latina” Sonia Sotomayor is ready to redefine it yet again.
Polygamist Kody Brown of “Sister Wives” fame have been granted more time to pursue an appeal in their case against Utah, FOX13 reports.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted the family until Sept. 10 to file a petition of certiorari to have the nation’s top court review their case.
SCOTUS has not considered a polygamy case in more than 100 years. So this is a Big Deal, because the only reason to consider Kody Brown’s case is to legalize polygamy.
Ostensibly, it’s for the Mormons.
There are about 30,000 polygamists in Utah, according to court documents. They believe polygamy brings exaltation in heaven — a legacy of the early Mormon church. The mainstream Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints abandoned the practice in 1890 and strictly prohibits it today.
Now riddle me this Batman. Given that the Mormons have disowned it, what major religion still actively encourages polygamy and would benefit the most if it were legalized today?
Did you guess Islam?
Of course you did!
Why not include animals? Is she a bigot? Animal hater?
I am sooo tired of seeing buttfugly Dhimmo skanks photos plastered across the media, especially the two here…
Quit complaining and get bust baking their cake, slave!
“Busy.” “Get BUSY baking their cake.”
Hell, I’m going back to bed.
Next is Beastiality, then pedophilia, lastly but not least comes necrophilia.
Leftism is cancer
WHY NOT?? THEY JUST IMPOSED TRANSGENDERS ON THE MILITARY!!
>> RTTUZYUW RHOIAAA0001 2182007-UUUU–RHSSSUU.
>> ZNR UUUUU
>> R 051937Z AUG 16
>> FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
>> TO ALNAV
>> INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
>> CNO WASHINGTON DC
>> CMC WASHINGTON DC
>> BT
>> UNCLAS
>> ALNAV 053/16
>> MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/-/AUG//
>> SUBJ/SERVICE OF TRANSGENDER SAILORS AND MARINES INTERIM GUIDANCE//
>> REF/A/SECDEF MEMORANDUM/30JUN16//
>> REF/B/DOC/DODI 1300.28/30JUN16//
>> NARR/REF A is DTM 16-005, Military Service of Transgender Service Members. REF B is Department of Defense Instruction 1300.28, In
>> -Service Transition for Transgender Service Members.//
>> RMKS/1. On June 30, 2016, the Secretary of Defense announced that the Department of Defense (DoD) had lifted the ban preventing transgender individuals from serving their Nation in the military. The Department of the Navy (DON) remains committed to ensuring that all who are qualified and wish to serve have the opportunity to do so. Until DON policies and procedures are released, interim guidance for the service of transgender Sailors and Marines is provided in this ALNAV.
>> 2. Consistent with the policies and procedures set forth in
>> references (a) and (b), transgender individuals shall be allowed to serve openly in the DON. These policies and procedures are premised on the conclusion that open service by transgender Sailors and Marines, while being subject to the same standards and procedures as other members with regard to their medical fitness for duty, physical fitness, uniform and grooming, deployability, and retention, is consistent with military readiness.
>> 3. Applicability. This policy applies to all DON military
>> personnel, including those serving in the Reserve Components.
>> 4. Definitions
>> a. Transgender Service Member. A Service Member who has
>> received a medical diagnosis indicating that gender transition is medically necessary, including any Service Member who intends to begin transition, is undergoing transition, or has completed transition and is stable in the preferred gender.
>> b. Gender transition process. Gender transition in the military begins when a Service Member receives a diagnosis from a military medical provider indicating that the members gender transition is medically necessary, and concludes when the Service Members gender marker in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) is changed and the member is recognized in the preferred gender.
Aaannnddd who didn’t see this coming?
Maybe the Wide Latina is looking forward to becoming the third wife of Omar the Tentmaker so she can get a new fall wardrobe for free?
😉
That Mexi-cunt needs a punch right in her fat, smug face.
Who, in their right mind, would want more than one MIL??
The difference between a Pollygamist and a Bigamist is a Polygamist marries multiple women WITH THE WIVES KNOWLEDGE. The Brown’s stated they were fearful they would be arrested if they stayed in Utah but Cody Brown legally married only one woman. He shacked up with 3 additional morons (I did not misspell Mormon) and being a full time , one sided swinger is not illegal. These people have created their own cult and are pushing for recognition and forced tolerance. They no longer want to feel like they are not normal. Humans are a monagamous species by nature and that’s just fact. Polygamy is a perversion created by men who have no respect for women and can convince those with no self worth to tolerate this nonsense. If the court rules to legalize it I wonder how many men will be stupid enough to share their woman with 5 more dudes. This judge should be ashamed to even entertain the idea .This society is doomed, people.
Just can’t imagine one or a handful of people deciding for everyone, yet that is what has been blatantly happening. Tell me who/what gives them the right? Our silence?
Unless we can get Trump in the WH, all is lost for SCOTUS and the nation…the libbies will fill up the outhouse pit, seal the door, and move it to a new location, burying America inside the dumpsite… progressivism is fatal! The end game is the END…
well, that did not take long.
Next on the agenda; incest.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/01/16/daughter-plans-to-marry-long-lost-father/21859547/
That headline is very misleading (thank somebody’s god/dess/es). You make it sound like SCOTUS is considering mandatory acceptance of multiple American’s as wives (like signing up for “selective service”).
TO Kilroy
Exactly WHAT’S “misleading”, dipshit?!?
Since SCOTUS has “determined” that MARRIAGE includes
mentally ill pairs of homos…?!!!
Exactly WHAT is misleading?!?
Czar, you miss your meds today?
As you have been almost human of late the Docs must have found the right balance.
The headline IS poorly worded.
That isn’t a punchable face. It’s a smackable with a baseball bat face.
Vietvet got it right – Wide Latina.
Czar, just for you I’ll type s…l…o…w…l…y…
The headline reads “imposing polygamy on America”.
I’ll quote myself, “it sound[s] like SCOTUS is considering mandatory acceptance of multiple American’s as wives”. I’m willing to grant that “spouses” would be more precise. But most Americans treat the words “polygamy” and “polygyny” as interchangeable. Since SCOTUS stands for “Supreme Court of the United States”, Americanisms should rule. Then, there’s the whole “some Americans call (one of) the biologically male spouses a ‘wife'”. So, I just opted for non-pedantic, and call “Trump”.
The body of the post reads like that would not be the situation (even if the case is accepted by SCOTUS, and then goes against the current regime’s current regulations).
Clear enough? Or do I need to type slow AND LOUD?
Higamous, Hogamous – Woman’s monagamous.
Hogamous, Higamous – Man is polygamous.
🙂
P.S. – I knew a guy who called himself a Pollygamist because he owned more than one parrot.
😛
So now we’ll have invasion by mail order?
Women from Syria ,first in line.
Great. So I can just find more women that won’t marry me?
“Ostensibly, it’s for the Mormons.”
When One Man/One Woman bit the dust recently, one of the rabbis I take care of asked: “So what’s to stop us from having multiple wives now?”
He has a point. What is the bottom line here? What are the limits since tradition has been thrown out? Based on what now? Certainly not religion.
If it happens, look for a number of Jews to jump on that bandwagon too.
For those of you jumping on Czar. You’re being a bit childish to focus on the false argument that it doesn’t force multiple spouses on anyone.
If any change in laws or regulation comes about without it going through the legislative process – it is being imposed.
Gay marriage was imposed on us. Are you saying it wasn’t because no one is forcing you to marry someone of the same sex?
That’s stupid to a liberal degree.
America wouldn’t be given a choice in the matter – and it’s supposed to be a Govt of the people, by the people and for the people. Not a Govt put upon the people by people who know better than us and will tell how it’s going to be!
Why is this so hard to understand?
Can you name the progressive who first put her on the fed Court? clue : he and his liberal son have the same name and both were Presidents!