MSNBC’s Ruhle on Hillary’s Email Statements to Benghazi Committee: ‘How Is That Not Perjury?’ – IOTW Report

MSNBC’s Ruhle on Hillary’s Email Statements to Benghazi Committee: ‘How Is That Not Perjury?’

Breitbart: On Wednesday’s broadcast of “MSNBC Live,” host Stephanie Ruhle played a montage of FBI Director James Comey contradicting Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s statements before the Benghazi Select Committee and asked Representative Matt Cartwright (D-PA), “How is that not perjury?”

Ruhle said that while FBI Director James Comey said that Clinton didn’t do anything with her emails that merited prosecution, “[I]t’s not like he gave her a stellar review and an A+.” After playing a montage contrasting Clinton’s statements to the Benghazi Select Committee with FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before Congress, in which Comey said that multiple statements Clinton gave to Congress weren’t true, Ruhle asked, “How is that not perjury?” MORE

5 Comments on MSNBC’s Ruhle on Hillary’s Email Statements to Benghazi Committee: ‘How Is That Not Perjury?’

  1. And the hill republicans will play a game of pretend they’re going after Hillary to make it look good, but they actually want her to win the election and ruin the country.

  2. i actually appreciate something about hillary

    she has made a mockery of the system, and shown both sides of the aisle to be stumbling, bumbling buffoons

    the entire system is broken, and the only one pushing for a break from status quo is trump

    hillary = continued decline and corruption
    trump = hard rudder, 180 turn, needed shakeup

    in the meantime, times are good for obama

    while the economy stinks and baton rouge sinks, milwaukee burns, isis, china and russia position themselves, he golfs at martha’s vineyard with 52% approval and gives all of us the finger

  3. Hey spinmeister, her emails did not just contain “confidential” information, but secret and top secret information as well. All on an unauthorized and unsecured server. The questions remain; Why, with whom and what was she up to? We may never know. The public record proves that time and time again, the Clinton’s have destroyed evidence that should have been used against them.

  4. it’s not perjury because she was not under oath when she ‘testified’ … that’s how they collude

    … it’s all Kabuki Theater for the masses

    Wake up … vote for the only ‘change’ that is available

Comments are closed.