NYT scraps ‘female genital mutilation’ for being ‘culturally loaded’ term – IOTW Report

NYT scraps ‘female genital mutilation’ for being ‘culturally loaded’ term

Hey pussy hatter club- Your phone’s ringing…

FOX: A top New York Times editor decided the paper shouldn’t use the term “female genital mutilation” because the phrase is too “culturally loaded” and widens a divide between the Western world and “people who follow the rite.”

Health and Science editor Celia Dugger said she came to the conclusion to refer to the act of removing the female genitalia of young girls as “genital cutting” during a trip to Africa in the 1990s. She spoke about her decision in a Times mailbag article in response to a reader’s question.  read more

19 Comments on NYT scraps ‘female genital mutilation’ for being ‘culturally loaded’ term

  1. I want to know if Linda SoSour is cut?
    And if not when ??? I want to see a piece
    of cunny as big as a 1970’s Bull’s Bay,SC
    single select turkey paw oyster sliced off!

  2. “people who follow the rite” ???!!! Sounds almost logical, doesn’t it? I can see the bobble heads now. “Oh, it’s a special cultural rite. Oh, ok.” What are the Times calling it, “female circumcision”?

  3. We can solve a lot of these problems if we make it universal for these folks.
    Equality, that’s the name of the game.
    You want to cut women? Fine.
    For every girl you cut, you need to bring in every boy or man in the family and we’ll do them too.
    The end of their dicks will be removed. Or their balls. Binary choice.
    Either do it for every one, or don’t do it at all.

  4. Wonder what these fake-news geniuses could come up with as a substitute for culturally condescending term “cannibalism” ?? Or “incest”?

    What’s ‘loaded’ is their cranium, loaded with cow kaka. These NYers have become no more than primitives. GTFAFM

Comments are closed.