Every time a Democrat appears on one of the news shows they claim it’s very important that they uncover the truth and get to the bottom of their investigations. But if that’s true, why are they blocking certain witnesses from testifying?
14 Comments on Why Are Democrats Blocking Witnesses From Testifying In House Intel Probe?
Comments are closed.
Because they might have “accidents” if they do
Because if they get testimony from anybody who was in a position to actually know anything, the dems might not be able to continue indefinitely what they want to be a permanent DJT-bashing fixture.
I haven’t seen the Demos do anything for this country in ages.
Because the too many Republicans do not have a backbone and are Never Trumpers –
Because Kampala Harris wants to sport a new hairstyle at the hearings, and she hasn’t decided yet? Or more likely, it’s better to feast on speculation about all the criminal things Carter Page will say in testimony, than to swallow the desiccated turd of reality?
When you “get to the bottom of this” all you find is more democrats.
Remember how the Benghazi witnesses went missing and silent?
Because the objective of this game is to keep DJT from passing any of his agenda. Disrupt, block, lie, for as long as they can.
The only truth they want to uncover is their version of it.
Because they know that the testimony would lead right back to Hillary “Wonderwoman” Clinton.
There are witnesses that can be bought, threatened or otherwise manipulated; then there are witnesses that aren’t leftists.
They want their “truth”, but not THE truth.
Maybe “if” Ryan had any testicles the democrats would be treated like the minority party they are.
But alas, ryan has no testicles and won’t be growing any, anytime soon.
“Maybe “if” Ryan had any testicles the democrats would be treated like the minority party they are.”
Ryan’s a Globalist who’s married to a lefty Prog school teacher. He’s doing exactly what they want him to do.