California discriminates with state-funded travel ban – IOTW Report

California discriminates with state-funded travel ban

FFA:

California Discriminates Against Four More States For Being ‘Discriminatory’

The Sacramento Bee reports that California has restricted publicly funded travel to Texas, Alabama, Kentucky, and South Dakota because the state government’s belief these states discriminate against LGBT individuals.

California already restricted travel to Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee.

“We will not spend taxpayer dollars in states that discriminate,” stated California Attorney General Xavier Beccerra on Thursday.
MORE

SNIP: As Andrew Breitbart said… “So?”
California’s so broke it would have to ask the other states for gas money in order to visit them anyway.

14 Comments on California discriminates with state-funded travel ban

  1. So, they are against Trump’s travel ban but for this? Did they ban travel to middle eastern countries? (of course not)
    BTW, Alabama is banned because our (new) governor signed into law that private adoption agencies do not have to allow LGBTQs to adopt babies from them.

  2. It should be tit-for-tat with all the states that have banned government travel to ban travel to California. I suspect the Golden State needs the money more then Texas et al. If California bans another couple of states they’ll start losing conventions and that’s big bucks. Hey, if that happens maybe that lunatic Brown can call that an improvement on the economy and give himself and all the boys (or whatever they are) big raises! Triples all around!

  3. One more thing about this law–Fresno State is playing Alabama (Roll Tide) this fall and the law was written so the football team was an exception and could come here (and make a lot of money).

  4. Our community here in Georgia stole a tennis tournament from North Carolina with a new tennis facility and the (under reported) new rule that you can sport your lady penis in the womens bathrooms.

    I think the penis rule was the deciding factor.

    Wanted to query the match directors if they did a field survey of the number of penises that took advantage of the perverse law we have.

    If there weren’t any, what was the point?

Comments are closed.