Hillary Would Have Been ‘The Booziest President’ Since The 40s – IOTW Report

Hillary Would Have Been ‘The Booziest President’ Since The 40s

Daily Caller: A new article asks some serious questions about Hillary Clinton’s drinking habits.

National Review’s Kyle Smith writes about the revelation from Amy Chozick’s new book that there was supposed to be an article in The New York Times after the election that portrayed Hillary as fun and laid-back, citing her drinking habits as proof.

Smith wonders why that article couldn’t have run before the election.

“The attentive reader will wonder whether Clinton has a drinking problem,” Smith writes. “Chozick says that Clinton would have been ‘the booziest president since FDR’ and ‘enjoys a cocktail — or three — more than most previous presidents.’ Chozick isn’t saying that Clinton has three cocktails but that she has three cocktails more than a man.”  MORE

18 Comments on Hillary Would Have Been ‘The Booziest President’ Since The 40s

  1. It would have been an interesting Presidency. A Hillary statement that “fuck it, I’m bombed” could have had disastrous consequences for Phuket, Thailand.

    11
  2. The effect of the election on the alcoholic beverage industry has been neutral. Instead of Hillary boozing it up in the White House, she has been drowning her sorrows in Chappaqua. And instead of the rest of the country drinking heavily to cope with Hillary being president, the rest of the country is drinking to celebrate the economic boom.

    10
  3. Typical Clintonesque tactic to get ahead of the story once Americans realized they elected an alcoholic to office. Everything about these nasty people is scripted.

    Thank you for winning President Trump.

    7
  4. So: five cocktails, then? Five cocktails for a woman is generally said to have the same effect as ten cocktails on a man.
    Damn amateurs. I consume that amount in just the happy hour at my house, on a weekday. Weekends can be epic.
    Maybe if I quit watching news I would sober up a bit, NAH, just kidding.

    4
  5. Remember when a drinking habit disqualified a nominee for secretary of Defense? Are the standards lower for a Commander-in-Chief, or just lower for a Clinton?

    3

Comments are closed.