American University orders students to agree women can revoke consent after sex – IOTW Report

American University orders students to agree women can revoke consent after sex

Thursday, 3 May 2018, 14:00 MJA Uncategorized 30

College Fix: If a man and a woman are both drunk and they have sex, the man is the rapist if the woman decides he is at some point, regardless of how she felt in the moment.

This is what American University is teaching students in a required sexual consent module, according to Red Alert Politics.

The module “asks students personal behavioral questions like how many sexual partners they’ve had and how often they drink,” according to Red Alert, which says the program is called “Campus Clarity: Think About It.”

That appears to refer to CampusClarity (since acquired by training provider EverFi), whose invasive questions were pulled from mandatory student training by Clemson University in 2014 after they drew outside scrutiny.  more here

30 Comments on American University orders students to agree women can revoke consent after sex

  2. Wow, the anti-sex league from 1984 is alive and well. What this means is that if you, for any reason, think the woman you’re about to have consensual sex with may be crazy or a bitch, run away as fast as you can. Blue balls is better than being gang raped in prison.

    8

  5. I know that the legal definition of rape usually includes sex with a woman who is intoxicated on the grounds that an intoxicated woman is not legally capable of giving consent.

    That does bring up an interesting conundrum: If a drunk woman is legally incapable of acting in a responsible manner, then shouldn’t a guy who is drunk also be considered as being incapable of acting in a responsible manner? But a drunk man is supposed to be responsible for his actions but a drunk woman is not. And what if the woman got the guy drunk in order to have sex with him? Isn’t that sexual discrimination? (This, of course, does not include secretly giving the woman an intoxicant.)

    And it what world is retroactively revoking consent legally acceptable?

    21

  10. If we follow this so-called reasoning to its logical conclusion, then to be safe a man should, after having sexual intercourse, kill the woman.

    Dead women recant no permissions.

    This is not, of course, the way things ought to be.

    8

  12. LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE – A FEW MORE MONTHS OF THIS BS AND THERE WILL BE MORE HORNY WOMEN THAN YOU CAN SHAKE A STICK AT!!!

    PLEASE!! DON’T!! STOP!! BECOMES PLEASE DON’T STOP!!!

    4

  14. This is either a campaign for gay recruitment or to revoke the 19th Amendment. Will have to waterboard university administration to get to truth.

    5

  21. THIS is why MGTOW is getting much more popular. And women wonder why it’s difficult to find the right man (especially after all they’ve seen in college are the metrosexuals feminism has created).

    This ruling says there’s nothing stopping a female from retracting her YES decision 30 years from now, especially if the guy was elected president. Oh, wait…

    6

  26. That’s going to put a BIG crimp in the college dating scene. There’s going to be a lot of frustrated women out there that, even if they get a date, it’s going to be a chaste event, not even a peck on the cheek. Maybe a handshake, but even that will become risky for the young man in this age of revocable consent.

    2

Comments are closed.

iOTWreport.com ©2024 ----- iOTWreport is not responsible for the content of comments. All opinions in comments are solely the commenter's.