PJM: Democrats are desperately trying to get John Bolton to testify in the Senate trial to hear what he has to say about President Trump and Ukraine, in the hopes they can make up for their weak case for impeachment with some brand new bombshell that will turn the tide against Trump.
But the Democrats have already heard from John Bolton. On August 27, 2019, Bolton gave an interview with Radio Free Europe and spoke about both of Trump’s phone calls with President Zelensky.
Bolton was asked if he planned to meet with President Zelensky, and what messaged he planned to bring to him.
“Well, I will be meeting Zelensky, he and President Trump have already spoken twice. The President called to congratulate President Zelensky on his election and then on his success in the parliamentary election. They were very warm and cordial calls,” Bolton said. [Emphasis added]
Bolton continued, “The success of Ukraine maintaining its freedom, its system of representative government, a free-market economy free of corruption and dealing with problems of the Donbas and the Crimea are high priorities here obviously and high priorities for the United States as well.” more
I am the Walrus! Coo coo, coo coo, kachoo!
Ya’ just don’t get it. It is Democrat’s feelings that prevail, not what was said but what they want Trump to have said. That is what the 2+2 does not necessarily equal four bullshit for the last four decades has been about. Progressivism is an end justifies the means philosophy.
THE IMPEACHMENT AND CALL FOR WITNESSES IS BECAUSE:
1. It keeps the Senate BUSY so they don’t approve anymore Trump judges for a while.
2. It puts Trump on the defensive.
3. It keeps Joe Biden on the trail instead of falling asleep in the Senate.
4. It dirties up Trump for 2020.
5. It MIGHT remove him from office, but unlikely.
6. It tries to put an asterisk on his administration.
And the reporters keep hammering, “How does this whole event cast a negative shadow on the White House?” –An innocent man framed and lied about? Doesn’t that cast a shadow on democrats?
What is said under oath is all that counts.
The nature and structure of the questions being asked, and how they are answered, can end up allowing a great deal of falsehood and innuendo to be introduced in a manner that makes them look like fact without actually being true or carrying any threat of perjury when they are not.
This is what I would expect to see happen, probably by design, in any sworn testimony Bolton gives.
Maybe I’m wrong, maybe we’ll see.
Sounds fishy. I’m reserving judgment until I hear Adam Schiff’s version of the transcript.
I give thanks to President Trump. The only man to expose, on a grand scale, the past’s executive branch and the past and present legislative and judicial branches as the sham and clown show that they really are.
Anonymous
JANUARY 30, 2020 AT 7:54 AM
“What is said under oath is all that counts.”
Because no one ever lied under oath.
The interesting thing to me is we once again only have second-hand accounts of what is in a manuscript, and THIS is what the entire case for the Dems hinges on. Just like the Kavanaugh case.
The dems will never stop lobbing things out there to try and smear Trump, the problem is the idiot repubs keep responding instead of saying Ah shut the fuck up asshole!
gin blossom
JANUARY 30, 2020 AT 10:45 AM
“The dems will never stop lobbing things out there to try and smear Trump, the problem is the idiot repubs keep responding instead of saying Ah shut the fuck up asshole!”
Bingo!