DNC Changes Debate Rules After Tulsi Gabbard Reaches Previous Requirement – IOTW Report

DNC Changes Debate Rules After Tulsi Gabbard Reaches Previous Requirement

She should drop out and endorse Trump. She has nothing to lose, and it will annoy the DNC.

Breitbart: The Democratic National Committee (DNC) on Friday announced its updated debate guidelines, which essentially eliminate the chance of Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) participating in the upcoming CNN/Univision debate.

In order to participate in the March 15 debate, a candidate must have earned at least 20 percent of the pledged delegates allotted up to that point. That effectively eliminates the chance of Gabbard, who remains in the race, participating, as she currently stands with two delegates.

The previous debate requirement allowed a candidate to participate if he or she had a single pledged delegate. If the DNC stuck to the previous rules, Gabbard, who did not qualify for any of the debates ahead of the caucuses in Iowa and Nevada or the primaries in New Hampshire and South Carolina, would have been able to participate. more

20 Comments on DNC Changes Debate Rules After Tulsi Gabbard Reaches Previous Requirement

  1. She would embarrass the hell out of Biden and Bernie. I said from the beginning she was the only serious candidate the Dems had. I hope she rethinks her 2A position and jumps ship.

    17
  2. The DNC has already decided on the candidate but is keeping up the pretext of letting their people make the decision, there is no point of including her she isn’t up for consideration.

    5
  3. In a free country anybody could attend and exercise their First amendment rights. Where in the Constitution does it say you have to be a Democrat or Republican? This is no different than being ruled by royalties.

    7
  4. DNC is terrified of Tulsi. I don’t know why, she has garnered a few percent but nothing significant. Yet CNN excluded her from its townhall series in a very obvious manner (including Deval Patrick who barely campaigned and had no support). And now this. I just don’t understand their fear. She is taking more votes from Bernie than from Biden anyway – although she is more likeable she is a socialist in ideology and has supported Bernie in the past. And they trot out this BS that she is a Russian plant – which not only is laughable, it ignores the fact that Bernie has spent a lifetime promoting Russian values.

    10
  5. Bad_Brad MARCH 7, 2020 AT 12:14 PM
    “I wonder if she ever got her papers served on Hitlary for the big law suit?”

    …now THERE’S a discovery process worth a barrel of popcorn…

    4
  6. The Tulsi definition of insanity: expecting the DNC to be fair.

    I’d expect a little more from someone who claims to be a combat vet.

    Tulsi, you heart is in the right place but your head is up your ass.

    7
  7. “now THERE’S a discovery process worth a barrel of popcorn…”

    I don’t think you or I could simply refuse to be served to avoid a law suit.

    Back in 2012! Or so Tulsi accused the Obama admin of suppling Weapons to Terrorists. Try and find that story on the internet.

    11
  8. tulsi is the only candidate that would actually give trump a run for his money.

    but it’s hillary’s turn.

    the dnc thinks it can harvest enough votes coupled with all the illegal votes to make it happen this time.

    5
  9. Tulsi is DINO. She is basically a moderate Republican. The only reason she has a D next to her name is bc they do not elect Republicans in Hawaii…period. she needs to switch parties asap!

    5
  10. Don’t be confused by tulsi occasionally making sense; she’s very left but the democrat party is so absurdly disconnected from reality. If it were 2004 or maybe even 2008 tulsi would’ve probably have the nomination. But to these cultists, any deviation from the dogma is heresy.

    2

Comments are closed.