WFB: Gov. Tate Reeves (R., Miss.) signed the Life Equality Act into law Wednesday, banning abortion on the basis of a fetus’s race, sex, or disability in the state of Mississippi.
The bill, which makes sex-selective, race-selective, or disability-selective abortion a felony, passed Mississippi’s state senate by a 33-11 vote and went to Reeves’s desk after a concurrence from the state house. The law’s language mentions sex-selective abortions and abortions targeting genetic abnormalities as examples of “modern-day eugenics.”
“Sex-selection abortions are used to prevent the birth of a human being of the undesired sex. Its victims are overwhelming [sic] female,” the law states. more
Thank you, Mississippi.
It’s a start.
This is unenforceable because there’s no way that an abortionist can verify what the reason is that some woman wants an abortion. It also violates federal HIPAA law.
Worse, it buys into and parrots SJW identity politics and concocts a specious reason for being against abortion. It implies that it’s somehow okay to abort healthy white males.
Pass a real law. With good reasons for it. Not one that panders to this crap in the hopes that it will appease some leftists. Damn this stupidity.
The Left will surely attack this, but I wonder what argument they will be using to do it?
The amoral nihilists abhor any restraint on their sacrificing the innocent.
Their contorted “logic” doesn’t have to be logical, at all – it only need be vehement and widespread – similarly to their supporting the burning and looting – the destruction of America.
As the janitor notes, this is a weak pretentious “stand” against evil.
There is NO moral justification for murder – cold blooded, indifferent murder – of innocents or of non-innocents – the idea is to acclimatize the nation to the practice of medical homicide while diminishing the “surplus population.”
izlamo delenda est …
@janitor July 4, 2020 at 1:27 am
> It implies that it’s somehow okay to abort healthy white males.
Since you read on the internet that Republicans disagree, how about a link?
Just that they claim to disagree. No actual proof required.