CTH:
The people on the ground in Windham, New Hampshire, are doing an excellent job holding the election officials and auditors accountable to the people during this forensic ballot audit. The audit started because the tabulating machines (Dominion hardware and software) did not accurately count the votes from the physical ballots.
During the first small audit (recount) it was discovered that Republican votes were undercounted and Democrat candidates were overcounted. This anomaly was discovered during a hand recount of the ballots as compared to the electronic tabulation results. After the first set of tabulation results were discovered to be inaccurate the state authorized a full forensic audit. The full audit is ongoing, here’s the update: more
But still “without evidence”?
So have any of the results so far shown a changed winner and loser or are the winners and losers still the same both with and without the audit count numbers?
That’s what matters, finding miscounts that don’t change any outcomes doesn’t mean much in the real world other than maybe a closer scrutiny and more careful procedure next time.
If “folded ballots” show a discrepancy in states where the outcome was not changed and the same machines and procedures were used in the pivotal states where voting was halted until they could count unobserved….. there’s a problem.
Also if absentee/mail-in ballots are not folded…..how the hell did they get mailed in….?
Has anyone come across a voting jurisdiction where the error benefited rupublican votes?
Just wondering.
And it’s not just that one county.
New Hampshire, and every state between it and Canada, used the same machine and the same ballot.
The impact could be huge.
If folds were a known problem, it is a simple thing to format the ballot to ensure that no bubbles align with folds. It is also simple to ensure a certain candidate’s bubble aligns with a fold. Hard to prove intent. Easy to plead ignorance or incompetence.
Funny how the miscounts always go in the Dems favor, ain’t it?