When the New York Times stepped into the ring with Project Veritas, it thought it would be a pretty easy victory, but the group known for undercover videos and on the scene fact-finding is a lot scrappier than the “paper of record” anticipated. Now, after a recent court decision, the Times is on the backfoot.
According to the Project Veritas website, Justice Charles D. Wood of the Supreme Court of New York in Westchester County handed down a ruling on Wednesday that the New York Times’ motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against them by Project Veritas is denied.
It all started when the undercover work done by Project Veritas in uncovering the Minnesota ballot harvesting was labeled as “deceptive.”
When Project Veritas brought the lawsuit against the New York Times, the Times attempted to defend itself by claiming the writer of the piece in question, Maggie Astor, was simply stating an “unverifiable expression of opinion.” Just one problem. That claim of the videos being “deceptive” was printed in the news section of the NYT, meaning they were trying to pass off the claim that Project Veritas was attempting to fool its viewers as fact.
The court agreed with Project Veritas:
https://redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/09/28/project-veritas-omar-n260765
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/ilhan-omar-connected-cash-for-ballots-voter-fraud-scheme-corrupts-elections/
Wouldn’t let me post the Project Veritas link.
Video is available there.
They need to win and take EVERYTHING from Pinch. Make him and all of his minions homeless.
The rational portion of the population already knows the Times is simply a DNC Mouthpiece. The True-Believers won’t care what the court finds.
“It ain’t over till it’s over.”
Can’t trust the NY (or any other for that matter) judiciary to pursue justice.
Courts are notoriously corrupt and they usually try to bamboozle the public with layers of bullshit. They can stretch this out for years, enriching the maggot lawyers and maggot judges, and then simply decide it’s over.
A decision not to dismiss is just a means to prolong the farce.
(if this seems cynical, it is)
Judicious rulings from courts all across the land can be counted on one hand.
izlamo delenda est …
This too shall pass; pity we no longer have a judiciary that cleaves to the constitution, state or federal. I reckon this judge’s decision will be overturned at some future date. Tim is right.
This is just kabuki theater to lull the serfs.
But the N has alway claimed to e be the liars of record.