CTH: During testimony last week, attorney Thomas Renz gave testimony {Direct Rumble Link} on behalf of whistleblowers inside the military medical system who have access to vaccination data that is withheld from the general public.
The data on adverse medical conditions that surface after vaccination within the military is contained on a system called the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). The documents that were released to Thomas Renz are now being reviewed {Direct Rumble Link}. The resulting information is very disturbing. MORE
There’s no recourse for any injury or death caused by the death jab. Remember, they say it’s strictly voluntary, they gave you a choice, get the jab or leave, strictly voluntary. Trump says “GET THE JAB!” People don’t like me pointing out that fact. All done in Warp Speed!
I’ve been following the stories about nano-tech being found in the vaccines. Last night this came up at Rumble:
“Undeclared Nanotech in the Pfizer Shots? New Zealand Scientists Have Also Found It . . .”
https://rumble.com/vtlt4q-undeclared-nanotech-in-the-pfizer-shots-new-zealand-scientists-have-also-fo.html
And if you haven’t watched the full 5 hours of Sen. Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” panel (also on Rumble), you should. This is compelling information that must be shared.
@Goldenfoxx — I tell you this with the utmost respect and with the affection we in our IOTW family have toward one another: Your continual pounding on the drum of POTUS Trump being responsible for all the covid jab mayhem is unfounded — or at least misdirected. I suspect there is more to your antipathy toward him than you are saying.
For one thing, you have been corrected numerous times over Trump’s views of getting the jab and his opinion of mandates. Yet you continue to insist/imply that he is in favor of mandates. I believe there is much more to be discussed about the then-fearsome spectre of this covid pandemic that ameliorates POTUS Trump’s decisions with regard to the vaccines. That would be a good discussion to have.
So some of the tankers might have achy breaky hearts? While they pulp those filthy inssurectionists?
That’s a shame.
@AbigailAdams January 31, 2022 at 11:25 am
> For one thing, you have been corrected numerous times over Trump’s views of getting the jab and his opinion of mandates.
“It’s fine if the country’s overrun by Squatemalans. As long as it’s a legal invasion.”
Interesting that a active military voice is heard on the vaccine issue of side effects.
Is there a revolt brewing inside our military?
Has FJB gone internal?
Pleased be advised: I don’t respond to comments directed to me or quoting me unless I have at least a small shot at deciphering the message. Try to be as concise about your point as you can be instead of using “clever” cliches, etc.
(And “boomer” is so last decade. Try to keep up.)
@AbagailAdams: I’ve been corrected on Trump’s stance on the jab? We’ve all heard him say it and he hasn’t backed down. He can say it over and over again to get the jab and it will bother me every time. I no longer trust him or his “intuition.” It bothers a lot of his supporters that he has taken the stand that he has on the jabs. It’s his baby and it’s come back to bite him. I understand he hasn’t been mentioning it at his rallies…why is that? Because it turns people off like me? So be it, he’s still all for it until he says “enough.” Google Trump and the vaccine.” He’s still pushing it, and no doubt he’d mandate it regardless of what he says.
@AbigailAdams January 31, 2022 at 2:43 pm
> And “boomer” is so last decade. Try to keep up.
As is sniffing Ivanka’s shadow. We play the team we have, not the team we want.
@@Goldenfoxx — As I say, I think there is more behind your antipathy for him than just the jab. I know I won’t change your opinion of him on this, but I will say that I know no Trump supporters who will split the sheets with him over this which perhaps provides a clue as to which Trump voters have always been too ready to find a reason to bail on him.
I, too, have been distressed at his promotion of the jab, but I am willing — for the present — to chalk that up to the wall of information gate-keepers surrounding him. And who knows — neither you nor I — how all this will shake out. He’s done too much genuine good to be piloried over this, as important as it is. I’m not willing to ascribe bad intent because his motives aren’t political, per se.
Not sure if true but that F35 that slammed and wrecked on the Carrier was having a heart attack. I would not fly on any plane knowing all pilots have been kill-shotted.
Only the Mickey Mauci worshipers are surprised by this!!!
…forgot to add: Your last sentence: So you think he would lie about mandates? That does tell me a lot about your opinion of him — that you don’t trust him because you think he’s a liar.
The Plan. And it’s working.
https://www.revolver.news/2022/01/globalist-big-lie-upcoming-2024-election-coup/