Runbeck: Election firm involved in Maricopa County’s alleged chain-of-custody violations – IOTW Report

Runbeck: Election firm involved in Maricopa County’s alleged chain-of-custody violations

Runbeck Election Services reaches “more than 70 million voters” across the country with its services.

JTN: As Republican Kari Lake appeals a legal defeat in her lawsuit challenging certification of her narrow loss in Arizona’s Nov. 8 gubernatorial election, she is alleging that ballot chain-of-custody issues occurred at Runbeck Election Services, a company that municipalities across the country use for outsourcing election operations.

Lake is appealing a ruling against her last month in her suit against former Secretary of State and current Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County election officials demanding the election result be set aside due to alleged failures and misconduct by the county. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson found that Lake had failed to meet a legal standard of clear and convincing evidence that intentional misconduct changed the outcome of the election

In her appeal, which challenges the legal standard applied by the trial court, Lake alleges that Maricopa County’s “massive violations of law and maladministration” included violating Arizona law’s chain-of-custody requirements by not having Election Day dropbox ballots counted at Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center (MCTEC) before going to Runbeck. MORE

5 Comments on Runbeck: Election firm involved in Maricopa County’s alleged chain-of-custody violations

  1. So Kevin Runbeck does not make political contributions anymore because it might look bad. Meanwhile brother Brian Runbeck contributed to the Obama campaign back in ‘08 and ‘12, and Biden in ‘20. All of which is interesting but does not address where the 25,000 mystery ballots came from.

    3
  2. Whether or not Kari proved she was deliberately robbed of the election, she was still robbed, and the election results should be thrown out. If I’m stopped at an intersection and someone slams into the rear of my car, I don’t have to prove he did it deliberately to collect damages.

    1

Comments are closed.