This Is the Most Important Climate Change Clip You Will Ever Watch – IOTW Report

This Is the Most Important Climate Change Clip You Will Ever Watch

Listen carefully, very carefully. This is the most important climate change clip you will ever watch – and only 4mins long. Watch and judge yourself. ABSORB the graph shown. THINK on it. USE your brain. h/t joe6pak

23 Comments on This Is the Most Important Climate Change Clip You Will Ever Watch

  1. Ah, but remember the science is settled! Leftoids, Greenies and other assorted Nut Bags and Crooks are not about to let facts get in the way of their whacko agenda… especially when it is a HUGe money maker!

    22
  2. Since I’ve been around & paying attention;
    1970s= new ice age coming
    1980s= hole in the o zone
    1990s= global warming
    2000s= climate change
    2020s= climate emergency
    killer bees
    murder hornets
    monkey pox……yada yada

    23
  3. Buuuuuut, it’s the single most important issue of our time, an emergency, an existential crisis. We must halt this natural warming phenomenon (that has been created by racist white men) at all cost. You’re a bigot to suggest otherwise.

    8
  4. Tony R at 8:33 am

    Future comment: Jergen Steffensen did not kill himself.
    ————————

    Al Gore is already plotting Steffensen’s demise.

    9
  5. Absolutely correct IMO. “Climate Change” hysteria began when reliance on very short-term meteorology observations drove “Climate Change” forecasts to promote global political change and profiteering schemes.

    So, now, from all of these false conclusions drawn from meteorological observations, we now have the greatest rich man’s scheme of all: “Green Energy”. Thus,

    Because solar/wind “Green Energy” cannot compete not only against the “low-carbon” energy of nuclear, geothermal, water power and natural gas, it also cannot economically match the power density output nor continuous service of fossil/petroleum fuels, all of these must be completely eliminated and/or never considered for “green energy” to succeed.

    5
  6. I’m sorry. I sense BS.
    I just re-watched the 1:00 to 2:00 section. How can you measure the temperature of ice NOW and use that to determine the temperature it was thousands of years ago?
    There is a phenomenon called “heat transfer” that tends to change temperatures of materials due to sources of heat (like the earth’s core). Temperatures measured now, thousands of feet deep, cannot accurately represent temperatures on the surface thousands of years ago. Also – you cannot accurately measure temperature to 1/1,000’s of degrees C.

    7
  7. @pianamusic
    Even if man made climate change is real (which I doubt) nothing done in the western world will have any effect if china and india keep using fossil fuels.

    8
  8. Jethro at 9:39 am

    Yes! I also caught that and was going to comment about the “heat transfer” issue from the Earth’s core until he later added that the same experiment was recreated in other parts of the world and came up with the same results.

    So, if the core heat-transfer Hypothesis is correct, this leaves a question to be answered whether the core heat will eventually equal the surface temperature of the Earth. Without any further explanation it is difficult to imagine that a drilled core hole can preserve the actual surface temperature of thousands of years versus preserving captured gases in the actual core samples.

    Still, IMHO, there are many other provable experiments and scientific (and financial) data showing that “Climate Change” is a bunch of BS, mostly spewing from those who seek power and/or fortune by any other means.

    4
  9. The man studying the core samples declares that their findings also match climatic observations since the Romans.

    I expect the climate fanatics to scream, “Temperature is not Climate,” when shown this video clip and the media will declare them the winners since they can scream the loudest in the most annoying way. “I mean they must be right to be so adamant,” the media will conclude then head off the bar or bury their heads back in their cell phones looking for the latest hit piece on Trump.

    2
  10. If heat transfer from the Earth’s core was the predominant factor in the ice temp, wouldn’t it be a declining slope?

    Not only is the initial part of the graph colder, there is approx no slope for around 4K years.

    I agree that there is heat transfer, so the ice may only ‘resemble’ or be not completely affected by the outside temp at the time. However, the outside temp at the time does have an impact.

    1
  11. Excellent video. Will anyone on the left follow the logic? Not the sheep, as they will think that they are lying.

    If a true scientist, and they aren’t being paid by the left to falsifying their science, then maybe. If they are humble enough to admit they are wrong.

    2
  12. How you measure the temps is by sending a thermometer down the shaft to take readings at predetermined intervals. The graph show temps at the bottom – those laid down in the most distant past – as being significantly warmer than those taken recently. The temps are all in the minus 30 C range. The increments on the graph are whole degrees, not thousandths of a degree.

    If the method is sound, then what is to be explained is the cooling trend from 8000 years past to today, as well as the recent warmings.

    At a minimum the graph does not seem to portend an immediate threat to human life by climate change.

    Politicians are a much more dire threat.

    4

Comments are closed.