Weaponization Committee: Michael Shellenberger Reveals US and UK Military’s Leading Role in Censoring American Speech – IOTW Report

Weaponization Committee: Michael Shellenberger Reveals US and UK Military’s Leading Role in Censoring American Speech

GP: The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Federal Government is holding a hearing to examine federal government-sanctioned internet suppression and attacks on journalists and media outlets.

The hearing will feature testimony from Matt Taibbi, Twitter Files journalist and author; Michael Shellenberger, Twitter Files journalist, author, and environmentalist; Rupa Subramanya, Canada-based journalist for The Free Pressand Olivia Troye, former Homeland Security Advisor and Counterterrorism Advisor, Office of Vice President Pence.

For years The Gateway Pundit has been one of the main targets of the government’s censorship complex.  Today, The Gateway Pundit is the lead plaintiff in the Missouri-Louisiana v. Biden free speech case that will be decided by the US Supreme Court early next year. This is the biggest First Amendment case in modern US history.  The Biden regime is arguing that the US government has a right to control media content in America today.

Earlier this week Michael Shellenberger revealed that a whistleblower recently stepped forward with documented evidence on the origins of the Censorship Industrial Complex following the election of President Donald Trump in 2016 and the passage of Brexit in the UK. MORE

SNIP: Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, Pakistan, Iran, Ukraine and Germany’s ‘intelligence’ will be trying to cover their asses next.

4 Comments on Weaponization Committee: Michael Shellenberger Reveals US and UK Military’s Leading Role in Censoring American Speech

  1. Don’t forget that Canuckistan & Australia was/is the Test Beds that they use see how shit goes down in the USA & England.

    Justine Dildeau did it to Truckers & Farmers YEARS AGO and DID use our military intel group to monitor Canadians illegally on what he is trying to make legal now.

  2. What should properly be the penalty for violating the supposedly unalienable rights of one of your citizens as an elected official who took an oath, or a member of the military who also took an oath? I bet a punishment of DEATH would be a better deterrent than a slap on the wrist.

Comments are closed.