The Exposé
For covid vaccines, they could have chosen to use relatively well-known existing technology, but they didn’t. Instead, they used mRNA, an unknown technology with zero safety profile. Why?
To find an answer, Jonathan Engler finds following the money usually gets closer to the truth. “In this regard … before 2020 pharma / biotech was struggling with a dearth of new ideas and many blockbuster products under pressure from pending patent expirations,” he notes. more here
That and just flat out murdering people. Never ignore the most obvious reasons.
Mengele/Fauci, Pfizer, Moderna, Gates, should all be prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code.
https://research.unc.edu/human-research-ethics/resources/ccm3_019064/
How can there be any room for more nails in their coffin?
@Anymouse — Put the coffin in a larger coffin and start nailing that shut. We could keep that up just about as long as necessary, or the world runs out of nails.
I saw something a few days ago (unfortunately can’t find it now) that said that DARPA researched potential treatments for SARS (covid-1) which was in 2001, and that in 2015 said the best 2 treatments were… ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Of course those have no profit margin…
Also, keep in mind that ivermectin was known to have many beneficial uses, and won its creators the 2015 Nobel Prize.
Here’s a link to what I referenced above:
https://x.com/ZN2_______/status/1602417793609396224
They hate us, they do the wrong thing, on purpose, every time. The death cult of leftism rules big pharma.
LCD @1:05
“…2001, and that in 2015 said the best 2 treatments were… ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
Of course those have no profit margin…
Also, keep in mind that ivermectin was known to have many beneficial uses…”
It seemed invious at the time the .gov cabal was supressing the benefits of those drugs in order to support the Emergency Use Authorization.
Yeah, there are a lot of people who need to meet Jesus…