DMUK:
Kamala Harris‘s husband was ‘inappropriate’ and ‘misogynistic’ at work, his former colleagues tell DailyMail.com.
Attorneys who worked with Doug Emhoff at his former firm Venable say he yelled expletives, held a men-only cocktail hour in the office, revoked work perks from women who didn’t flirt with him, and took only young, attractive associates in a limousine to a ball.
A 2019 lawsuit also claimed sex discrimination by other partners in the LA office Emhoff ran, and that while engaged to Harris, he hired an ‘unqualified’ part-time model as a legal secretary ‘because she was young, attractive and friendly with the powerful men in the office’.
The claims are the latest in a string of allegations revealed by DailyMail.com that threaten to shatter Emhoff’s image, heavily promoted by the Harris presidential campaign, of a feminist ally and ‘wife guy’.
In August DailyMail.com revealed the Los Angeles lawyer cheated on his first wife and got his daughter’s grade school teacher-cum-nanny pregnant.
Kamala must have been sleep-deprived when she picked him.
Watch out for that bus, Dougie.
Sleep deprived from giving Willie Brown too many hum jobs. Dougie’s name should be pronounced like the Scots do as Diggie.
He had all those hot chicks around him and he married Kamala?!
This is looking more like an arranged political marriage, like Huma Abedin and Anthony Wiener.
Another reason Donald Trump has populist appeal: He married the hot chick(s).
I wonder if he notices that JILL tastes like me, TOO!
Hee-hee!
“This is looking more like an arranged political marriage, like Huma Abedin and Anthony Wiener.“
Get with the times, Annie. It’s currently Huma Abedin and Alex Soros.
But, but, Trump sent Putin some Covid tests for personal use!
@Third Twin: Oh, I keep up with the political gossip. Huma Abedin is a serial arranged marrier and both her beaus are perverts. These aren’t marriages; they’re alliances that bring the individuals benefits and cover, while advancing the cause that makes the arrangements.
I don’t find her particularly attractive, but then again airheads get on my nerves right away
Annie, I figured you knew. I should have added a smiley or something. And your point still stands, regardless of the parties involved.
As a democrat he’s exempt from scrutiny. Move on. Nothing to see here.
Who else would marry the pig he married?
Why do we keep allowing lawyahs anywhere near power?
And especially Harvard educated lawyahs.