‘Where The F*ck Were You?’: Doug Emhoff Offers Brutal Glimpse Into Marriage With Kamala – IOTW Report

‘Where The F*ck Were You?’: Doug Emhoff Offers Brutal Glimpse Into Marriage With Kamala

Daily Caller

Doug, no. Doug … no. Doug … NOOOOOOOOO!

Brace yourself. Second gentleman Doug Emhoff just gave Americans an honest, if a bit too honest, glimpse into his marriage with Kamala Harris.

During the Dan Le Batard Show on Tuesday, Emhoff recalled the day he learned President Joe Biden dropped out of the race. He was at a SoulCycle class in Los Angeles, of course, sweating bullets next to a gay couple when one of his friends told him the news.

Emhoff said his phone was in a Secret Service car outside, so he “ran” to the vehicle, “and there was my phone, literally like you could feel the steam.” He then called Kamala for a “one-minute or less conversation, which started with, ‘Where the fuck were you?’ … I need you right now. And basically, ‘Get to work.’ And I did.”

Tough scenes. I would like to think if this was a normal, healthier relationship, Harris would have called her husband and said something to the effect of: “This is so exciting. I’m so happy to be alongside you on this rollercoaster ride. It’s going to be a ton of work, but we’ll do it together. I love you. You’re my rock. How was your spin class?” more

13 Comments on ‘Where The F*ck Were You?’: Doug Emhoff Offers Brutal Glimpse Into Marriage With Kamala

  1. I likely story… He was in “spin class” with a “gay couple”… Why is that second part so important? Because he was banging some woman. Why were her first words “Where the fuck were you?!” Because she knew too.

    5
  2. …so they are so desperate that they want to spin her some battered wife sympathy now, maybe gin up some more misandry along the way?

    Well, as much as I may think she needs a slapping, if true it does give me some sympathy for her to a point, and extra disgust for her already disgusting cuckbeard.

    I seen enough of that woman beating shit to last me a lifetime, and I have no problems with “men” who lay their hands on women beyond the minimum necessity of self-defense being beaten by other men and then referred to the nearest prison shower to learn about abuse from the other end. Certainly Dougie could use some attitude adjustment, although he may well enjoy it.

    But the sympathy for whatever beating Kamala may have absorbed doesnt extend to saying she deserves to shelter in the White House.

    Many of the women I saw that were abused unsurpisingly had mental issues that impaired their decision making skills. When a battered and bloody woman sees her abuser being dealt with, she sometimes will jump in on his side for a myriad of “reasons” from trying to protect her meal ticket to thinking that this will make the reuinion beating when he gets out (and he will) less severe, to trying to protect her children from same and the ever-popular “Battered Wife Syndrome” where a woman is so beat down that she starts thinking she is doing something to justify it, not to mention side trips to places like Pride because a woman doesnt want to admit her marriage even has a PROBLEM (those racoon eyes from the skull fracture can make keeping up appearances difficult) and to the Land Of Delusion where a beaten woman convinces herself that she can change him if only she wears his knuckles down on her face just a bit more; and leave us not forget that outside of Islamic law marital rape is still a thing, and rape is rape and even a MARRIED woman can be humiliated to the point of suicide by forced and unwelcome sex whether theres a marriage license or NOT.

    …we’d need a LOT more space to get further into abuse psychology, a subject I really wish I hadnt learned about, but suffice to say that someone suffering from the marital version of Helsinki Syndrome isnt someone you want sitting around the White House in a dark mood with the nuclear football at their disposal.

    Whether that spousally abused person’s name is Kamala Harris…or Bill Clinton…

    2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.