Wife of Alexander Vindman, the Democrats’ star witness for Trump’s impeachment, says her family wasn’t offered any pardons and she’s very hurt.
Is there something her family would need a pardon for….? •
The Trump admin should look into this.
Alexander Vindman Didn’t Get a Pardon and His Wife is Mad
We have a hard time describing it, also.
Didn’t know that faggot was Married….Wonder if it is one of those Chuck
Schummer “Fred Flintstone” Lookalikes?
Don’t think ‘Treason’ is pardonable.
Poor bitch, she’s left feeling betrayed.
Eat it.
Speaking of the Military, did you see that stupid dame on NBC ask the question on how they were going to reinstate the soldiers with backpay for 4 years for not taking the shot. She must be too stupid to understand that Bidumb sent hundreds of millions of dollars to Ukraine that far exceeded a few thousands for soldiers.
“Don’t think ‘Treason’ is pardonable.”
My understanding as well. If that’s the case Milley needs to be recalled for duty immediately. And then charged with treason. In fact, I go so far as to speculate about 70% of the pardons that were passed out will not hold up due to treasonous acts.
And Adam Kinzinger is just one giant piece of shit. Can he be charged for that?
He was a disposable tool, he’d outlived his usefulness, and he likely didn’t have anything he could use as leverage to get himself a pardon. And the fucker deserves everything he’s probably got coming to him, and worse.
To Vindman, et al:
…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…
How about Trump issuing an EO that negates all of Biden’s pardons based on his mental incompetence? Dems would have to sue. Exhibit one…first witness for Trump…Joe Biden. Put him on the stand.
Enjoy your stay in a fed lockup you fat fuck.
Vindman wasn’t doing Bidet’s bidding, he was a treasonist asshole all in his own right.
Now he’s hung out to dry, all on his own.
Couldn’t happen to a bigger blivit.
May Vindman get what he deserves.
As the famous expression goes,
F*** the f****** f*****,
No man stands with a traitor.
Not even another traitor in a party of traitors.
I hope your husband enjoys Mornay’s wages, chick.
Might want to figure out what youre going to do while hes off getting ass raped in the Big House.
You know, ass raped. Like he helped Democrats do to US.
…believe me, chick, I dont wanna see your hubby in prision either.
I’d MUCH rather see him HERE…
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Wirz/WIRZEXEC.JPG
Hey Rachel, the British had no respect for Benedict Arnold, either. You chose poorly.
…while we’re on the subject, maybe President Trump needs to create a new cabinet position?
Office Of The Gallows has a nice ring to it.
If things are done properly, the hangman will be the busiest person in all DC…
@general malaise; My sentiments exactly
Constitution of the U.S., Article 2, Section 2 (in part):
I cannot find anything in that document that prevents the President from granting a pardon for treason (which is, after all, an “offense against the United States”).
If there is something in the U.S. Code that applies, it seems to me that it would be unconstitutional if ever challenged.
I wish it were otherwise.
<UK-usage>
Yes, Vindman’s wife is mad.
And she’s also quite angry.
</UK-usage>
Uncle Al
You’re probably right. I have not had time to research it. But I seem to recall it being under Military Law. You might check there if you have the time.
@Brad — Thanks for that suggestion! What I found is promising.
First, military tribunal verdicts and sentences are NOT pardonable.
Second, non-military offenders can be tried by military tribunal in multiple circumstances (I won’t discuss/list them all here).
Third, the UCMJ implicitly recognizes the Constitutional definition of treason, and it can be prosecuted under Article 94 of the UCMJ, which deals with mutiny and sedition.
Vindman, being (ex)military, is MOST DEFINITELY subject to military justice.
Uncle Al
I’m going to poke around some more tonight. I found the same thing. Something I had forgotten,
“Although the president’s pardon authority is extremely broad, it is not without limitation. The plain language of the Constitution limits the scope of the president’s power to “offenses against the United States,” which precludes its application to “state criminal or civil proceedings,”
These people are not out of the woods by any stretch. I hope the J6 people leave her eternally broke and washing glasses at the biggest dive bar in Bum Fuck Wyoming. Lot’s to work with here.
Uncle Al
I’m sure you know this but Elon accused Vindman of getting paid by the Ukranian Government while he was stationed over there and in our military. Elon wouldn’t have typed it if he could not prove it. Vindman is fucked and his wife’s just smart enough to figure that out. Nothing worse than trailer trash with a little bit of money.
“I hope the J6 people leave her” her=Liz Cheney. I should stop typing now.
@Brad — Here’s something to consider. The J6 slime (and others) were pardoned but there’s and end date to the period of the pardon.
Imagine if they are subpoenaed to come back and testify under oath about events back then. They’d either have to admit what they did, or perjure themselves outside their pardons’ limits for which they could be charged, tried, convicted, sentenced, and totally fucked.
Hmmmm.
Oops. “…there’s an end date…”
Dang fingers.
Well, when you’re relying on a dementia patient to hand out pardons and he has done more than 8,000, somebody is bound to get left out.
Uncle Al
Isn’t a Pardon required to address a specific crime? In other words he can’t issue a Pardon exempting them from every damn thing for the last what ever time period. I’ll try and find one of those pardons tonight and see how it reads.
@Brad — Unfortunately, pardons can be worded in such a way as to be pretty much blanket. Look at that corrupt pervert Hunter’s pardon.