GP: Authorities are now investigating whether Tyler Robinson’s romantic relationship with his transgender roommate was the motive in his decision to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
22 Comments on Police Investigating Whether Killer’s Bromance with Trans Roommate is Motive in Assassination of Kirk
Comments are closed.
Ya think?
I saw a report on Twitchy, I think, that they’re widening the investigation. Not they don’t think he did it but that he may have had help.
I also ran across this X post this morning:
https://x.com/RobertMSterling/status/1966974489553461366?t=_a6tGAKNMNVXkZ7VCeyKHg&s=09
It is very long, very well written & starts with this:
“My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue.”
Yeah, what he said.
Yes. Completely. Maybe even solely.
When viewed through the lens that C.K.’s mindset completely invalidated the particular sin he wanted in his life.
How could he ever accept Charlie’s position as an “it’s only a different opinion” knowing he would be invalidating his own life?
Bottom line: Sick minds do sick things. The logic wires get crossed all the time with them. Paranoia being a frequent reason.
Doesn’t matter what stirred the sick mind. You can’t be ready for infinite insanity coming at you.
It’s pretty simple. Robinson couldn’t accept his own sexuality. He was repulsed by his own deviancy. But instead of owning that self-disgust, he externalized it, blaming a public figure like for “not accepting him” based on left wing habitual false narratives about Kirk’s positions on homosexuality, rather than Robinson’s own subconscious, which is what really did not accept Robinson’s own faggotry. Robinson won’t be the first man repulsed by his own sexual deviancy, and he won’t be the last. Robinson just wasn’t man enough to own the fact that part of him hated what he is, i.e. a homo.
I hope they have sufficient probable cause to seize the roommate’s phone and to scrub his SM postings. This loser did not just wake up one morning and decide to commit murder. If there is a shred of evidence that the roommate knew about this ahead of time, he needs to be arrested and tried as an accessory.
^^^^^^
That idiot Gov is insisting it was just the one shooter that was involved. “Because he said so”. The FBI doesn’t seem to agree. And now Congressional Dems are after Patel’s head. Strange things going on. The FBI seems to be leaning towards this is some Chics with Dicks terrorists network.
I’m not as concern about the motive as building enough physical evidence to earn the death penalty; then go after the network.
Dr Tar
Actually I’m not so sure it matters anymore who pulled the trigger. We know who killed him. The left killed him. Including and especially the libtard news media.
This story just KEEPS GETTING SICKER.
He was over loaded on MSM mental poison brain wash. And no one is brave enough to end it for fear of a MSM attack on themselves.
My dream scenario is that a deep dive into the shooter’s SM postings will reveal incendiary tweets from prominent CNN/MSNBC vermin hosts calling Kirk a nazi and a trans hating fascist, and evidence is uncovered that he sent texts to friends/sympathizers, “See, we gotta do something to stop this guy, haters need to be eliminated”. And Kirk’s widow sues the networks for a bajillian bucks, putting them out of business.
Captain Obvious is heading the investigation.
The scumbag mayor of LA (communist Karen Bass) refuses to allow flags to be put at half-mast for Charlie KirK
https://x.com/AnthonyCabassa_/status/1966689321487896692
The Kirk assassination was a well planned operation by antifa. The “roommate” was in on it, the SLC branch of the fbi KNEW about it, let it happen, then sat on the clearest surveillance photos to give the perp a lead until the pictures were made aware of to Patel, who threw a wall-eyed fit when he found out. The twat governor is also protecting the “roomate” for some reason. Charlie’s “security” team was bought off, or compromised, or they’re absolutely incompetent (and we haven’t heard from them either, have we?). 2 of them are seen clearly giving signals to someone right before the fatal shot.None of them spotted the shooter on the roof directly in front of them and acted on it. This was yet another deepstate assassination.
Two thoughts:
1. This has to be a pincer movement, whereby the feds come at the transgender activist terrorist movement from above — the money sources. And from below — all the web-based communications trails, thus netting every single user who has ever written/replied to every other person on their shared digital highway.
2. POTUS Trump must legalize immediately through EO — and preferably through congressional legislation — that “transgender activist terrorists” organizations are officially domestic terror organizations. There’s more than enough proof that they are an organized entity despite their not giving themselves a name to operate under.
Post mid-1960s, when it was obvious that the hippy era, progressive left’s goals of changing society to fit their socialist agenda had failed, the Left resorted to extreme violence and murder. The Weather Underground, PLO and Black Panthers perpetrated bombings, riots, and murders in an attempt to coerce Americans to their way of thinking.
This is why today’s “Resist” crowd is crowded with so many 70 year-olds who are just as ignorant today as they were in their hippy youth of the late ’60s and early ’70s. It’s like a bloody class reunion for them, where they get to regale “the old days” and relive their “good times.”
If we don’t rid ourselves of these people, we’ll be right back at it again in another 60-70 years.
Steve Sailer asserts today that Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated by the Transgender Movement.
He makes good points.
p.s. Gov. Spencer “Tiny” Cox is another guy who needs a blanket party.
@txfella
Charlie’s “security” team was bought off, or compromised, or they’re absolutely incompetent (and we haven’t heard from them either, have we?).”
Sorry Txfella, I can’t agree with this statement. Charlie had bodyguards with him. I saw one of them many times – he was a strong-looking muscular man who wore sunglasses and kept his eye on the surrounding crowd. I could never tell if he was armed, but if he was, it was likely just a pistol under his shirt. I don’t think it would not have been good enough to take out a rifleman on a roof 200 meters away, even if he had seen him in time.
Charlie was probably relying on university security, which unfortunately did not consider a rooftop shooter, which given what happened in Butler, PA, they should have. University security failed with tragic consequences.
^^^^^^
error correction to take out double negative:
I don’t think it would have been good enough to take out a rifleman on a roof 200 meters away, even if he had seen him in time.
@Tim Buktu — He wouldn’t have had to take the shooter out, just stop him from shooting.
@Uncle Al
The bodyguard I’m referring to always stood within a couple of feet of Charlie.
The only way the bodyguard could have stopped the assassination was to have gone up to the roof and stopped the shooter before he squeezed the trigger of his rifle. That was not possible because the bodyguard never left Charlie’s side in all the videos I have seen of Charlie on various campus speaking engagements.
There were a lot of rooftops in the area. How would the bodyguard know which one to go to in order to prevent the shooting?
Lance Twiggs 😂
Tim Buktu
Or he could have shoved Charlie out of the line of fire and/or covered him with his own body,
None of his security saw the threat.