Guest column by criminal defense attorney David W. Fischer details all the flaws in Alvin Bragg’s case against Donald Trump and offers one argument Trump’s attorneys might be overlooking.
Jury selection has begun in the New York City “hush money” trial of Donald Trump, who is charged in a 34-count indictment with falsifying business records of the Trump Organization. This case is part of a Democrat-led effort to engage in lawfare on various Progressive battlefields.
To date, Trump’s legal team has done a masterful job in fighting these politicized prosecutions with a variety of clever legal arguments and maneuvers. Yet even the best attorneys can overlook a compelling weakness in the prosecution’s case. Trump’s legal team has, without success, made dozens of strong arguments for dismissing his New York case. In my judgment, however, Trump’s team has yet to make the most compelling argument on behalf of their client.
Below is the argument that Trump’s team should strongly consider making in his “hush money” trial. more here
It’s naive to think the letter of the law has anything to do with the latest Trump railroading effort. The democrats are a rabid pack of fascist cocksuckers, and the solution to them has nothing to do with courtrooms.
There is no argument you can make in a New York Court about the law. They can even throw out whatever parts of the Constitution they don’t like on a whim, making a defense impossible.
https://iotwreport.com/they-say-trump-is-anti-constitution/
If the judge rules you are acting against the Communist program, that’s it, you’re done.
The law is now what Democrats SAY it is, and subject to change at any time.
Alvin the Chipmunk 🙂
Didn’t the politicians have a slush fund that they used to keep things out of court? Seams like I remember Rush talking about it every now and then.