Backlash: ‘Anti-Muslim’ speakers dare Lynch to prosecute – IOTW Report

Backlash: ‘Anti-Muslim’ speakers dare Lynch to prosecute

WND: If Attorney General Loretta Lynch plans to keep her promise made to a Muslim legal group to prosecute “anti-Muslim” speech – a promise delivered the night following the massacre of 14 Americans in San Bernardino by Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik – she may want to begin with two Republican former office holders.

lynch

Both are delivering online rants against Islam and are daring Lynch to charge them. MORE

SNIP: Ball’s in your court, Holderina.

22 Comments on Backlash: ‘Anti-Muslim’ speakers dare Lynch to prosecute

  1. Hey Loretta Bitch!

    -The Terrorists broke the law by conspiring to commit a mass-murder.
    -They broke the law by illegally transporting weapons.
    -They broke the law by concealing weapons without a permit.
    -They broke the law by possessing unregistered semi-automatic guns.
    -They broke the law by possessing guns with Illegal features and parts.
    -They broke the law by possessing “high” capacity magazines.
    -They broke the law by bringing guns to a gun-free zone.
    -They broke the law by going armed to the terror of the public.
    -They broke the law by constructing bombs.
    -They broke the law by detonating bombs in an attempt to assault and murder.
    -They broke the law by brandishing weapons.
    -They broke the law by assaulting people with weapons.
    -They broke the law by attempting to murder people with weapons.
    -They broke the law by murdering people with weapons.
    -They broke the law by disobeying Police orders.
    -They broke the law by evading Police.
    -They broke the law by attempting to murder Police Officers.
    -They broke multiple traffic laws during the pursuit.
    -They broke the law by endangering the public during the car chase and the police shoot-out.
    -They broke the law by resisting arrest.
    But we need to create more laws to stop this from happening…

  2. I liked that article. Brings up good points.

    If the so-called “Peaceful” Islamists actually have a problem with all these so-called “Radical” Islamists, they need to renounce their actions or form a different sect.

    But they don’t. Have ANY of you seen a “peaceful” islamist speak out against islamic violence? Anyone?

    No. Either the DO support it, or they are terrified that if they do they would be targeted as well. Either reason is equally likely and both are serious problems.

  3. I’m of the mindset that any muslim will partake in jihad when the time is right or if they are sufficiently angered or offended.

    I’m convinced that any imam in any mosque that tells the press or any non-muslim that being “peaceful” is allowable per the koran is lying.

    Muslim presence in any non-muslim country is a foothold for invasion, pure and simple.

  4. The koran has parts in it that speak of peace and parts that call for bloody murder of infidels. But the violent parts come after the peaceful parts and the way it goes is the part that comes later supersedes the previous.

    The only good and proper muslim is a “radical” muslim. Any muslim that is actually and truthfully living as peaceful is a bad muslim according to their own rules.

  5. Affirmative Action

    There are doctors, as well as lawyers, electricians, plumbers, A/C mechanics, carpenters, middle managers, teachers, administrators, social workers, …, &c.

Comments are closed.