DC:
Hillary Clinton is “not very bright” and fails to realize what issues are important to the American public, says former White House strategist Steve Bannon.
In an unaired portion of an interview on “60 Minutes,” Bannon launched into a diatribe against the former Democratic presidential candidate and a speech she gave on the campaign trail last year attempting to tie the “alt-right,” Breitbart News, and white supremacists to the Trump campaign.
Bannon, who served as chairman of Breitbart News at the time of the April 25, 2016 speech, said Clinton’s remarks “landed flat.”
“Hillary Clinton’s not very bright. Everybody says she’s so smart, so much smarter than Donald Trump,” Bannon said in the interview. “She doesn’t really have a grasp, she doesn’t have a grasp on what’s important and what’s not, and that’s what’s essential in a leader.” Watch
Well DUH
She flat does not care!
For someone who thinks with her vagina she does modestly
well!
She can’t wear sunglasses anymore!
Thanks, Capt. Obvious, for the tip.
I’ve been telling people this for decades. It’s great to finally get a second opinion.
I agree. She’s dull.
Also, Barry is not that smart. Newsflash!
She’s as sharp as a marble.
Hillary is so dumb when she tried to get revenge on her rapist husband, she stuck a phone up her ass thinking she was making a booty call.
Back in the old days they just called her the lying, nasty, vile, shameless, manipulative, foul, anti-semetic, Alinsky-loving, seditious old Forty-Watt!
She and Barry are not exactly scholars of anything, certainly not Legal scholars.
Hell no! Neither one could make it in the private sector!
That’s why they went into politics!
What was that Dean Wormer said in Animal House? Oh, yes; ‘Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!’
Hollywood Leigh Scott writes:
In addition to monkeying with the color correction, CBS used a deceptive editing trick that we call the “L cut” to make it look like Charlie Rose was actively debating and cutting off Bannon.
And L-cut is when you overlap the picture of one person with the audio of the other. You remove any real pause or break that happened and make the entire thing seem more active.
There are a couple of dead give aways. One, you will note that Bannon is rarely talking over Charlie. Charlie seems to cut him off and Bannon just takes it. Yet, it’s very clear that Bannon is cutting off Charlie because you can still hear Charlie talking in Bannon’s microphone. The quality of Charlie’s audio changes slightly because Bannon is steamrolling over his bogus, Left wing talking points.
A media professional who works with Charlie Rose said this to me this AM:
“CBS used L-Cuts to make Charlie look in-charge of the interview, rather than drool into his oatmeal.”
Folks on the Right need to start demanding these interviews be live or not at all…
OR, Conservatives need to be smart enough to STOP going on Libtard Networks. What’s next for Bannon, the View?
And cankles failed the ny bar exam at least twice.
How can anyone say she is not that bright? Just look at that genius child she spawned and raised. Smarts like that doesn’t come by accident you know.
What gave it away? Calling half the country ‘deplorable’ and continuing to double down on that a year later? “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead” … ‘nough said.
Joe, Chelsea got whatever brains she has from Webb Hubbell.
@Mr. Pinko: The color was really, REALLY ‘monkeyed’ with (haven’t heard that term in yrs–happy memories!)!
Even digital editing must require a vectorscope of a sort, so you know the correct colors are going out for broadcast.
But…colors can be ‘tweaked’. In this case, the red was taken off the proper spot, thus enhancing the saturation. All of Bannon was treated this way–I haven’t seen the two-shot.
Not only does Bannon look ‘florid’, but so do the drapes, the paint and even the daylight! Most will never notice, but for those of us who do, it gives us one more nail for the MSM COFFINS!!!
Gal, they made him look like a evil star wars emperor. The dark eyes, the red eyelids, the whole works.