Biden: I Am ‘Constantly Tested’ For Cognitive Decline – IOTW Report

Biden: I Am ‘Constantly Tested’ For Cognitive Decline

DailyWire: Presumptive Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden said during a press conference on Tuesday that he is “constantly tested” when asked by a reporter if he has been screened for cognitive decline.

“Some have speculated that you are subject to some degree of cognitive decline,” the reporter said. “I’m 65, I don’t have word recollection that I used to have, I forgot my train of thought from time to time. You got 12 years on me, sir.”

“Have you been tested for some degree of cognitive decline?” the reporter asked.

“I’ve been tested and I’m constantly tested,” Biden responded. “Look, all you got to do is watch me and I can hardly wait to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive capability of the man I’m running against.” WATCH:

28 Comments on Biden: I Am ‘Constantly Tested’ For Cognitive Decline

  1. “Biden: I Am ‘Constantly Tested’ For Cognitive Decline”

    yep, he sure is, every time he opens his mouth.

    The results aren’t reported, but they are fairly self-evident…

    8
  2. …I’ve posted this before but, since it’s mine, I’ve modified it a bit, and it seems relevant, here again is a song that Joe could sing us about himself, were he honest and could memorize the words (yeah, I know…)

    (To the tune of “If I Only Had A Brain”)

    “I could sniff away for hours
    Litle girls who smell of flowers,
    Touching all the time;
    And my nuts I’d be a scratchin’
    While twisted thoughts are busy hatchin’
    ‘Cause I’ve got a pervy mind.

    I’d unravel ev’ry ribbon in her hair that she’s been given
    Then grind her from behind,
    ‘Cause the thoughts I’ve been thinkin’
    Like Mohammads they be stinkin’
    ‘Cause I have a pervy mind.

    Oh, I, could touch a guy,
    Or molest some paid-for whore,
    But I wanna touch what’s not been touched before,
    And then I’d grin, and touch some more,

    People think I’m just a muffin’,
    A harmless old man puffun’,
    I let ’em think they’re being kind;
    But their children I be feeling
    Even with the cameras reeling
    It gets off my pervy mind.”
    -“The Biden Song”, apologies to “If I Only Had A Brain”

    9
  3. …Joe probably IS losing it, but I think he’s overplaying it on PURPOSE so he can step aside on command at the convention in favor of “Michelle”, and also to set up a “witless” defense because it would be literally impossible to even interview an addled old man about his numerous crimes, let alone actually bring them to trial, and what a wonderful way to NEVER have any testimony about the Clintons that might require “suicide” later…

    …don’t confuse “evil” with “stupid”. These people may SEEM dumb, but THEY have the high-paying, high-power jobs, THEY can kill and commit treason with impunity, THEY can say whatever they want without consequences, and THEY can have any of US jailed or killed any time they like on little pretext or no pretext at all, THEY can lock US out of OUR very CHURCHES any time they like, FORCE us with the full force of the Federal Government to accept perversion and deviancy in all walks of life, and THEY write the rules for US without even PRETENDING to do it through the legislative process any more, and ALWAYS exempt THEMSELVES from those EXACT SAME RULES.

    …so who’s that make the dumb ones, then…

    6
  4. Dementia Joe Obiden Bama wants you to vote for that other guy if you feel strongly about this brain matter. You know the other guy who is running for the you know the Senate from that country where all men and women are created by the thing. Don’t be a lying, Tara Reade believing Pony Shoulder. Only 124 or 125 days until the election. Not enough time to grow a functional brain.

    1
  5. Tony R JULY 1, 2020 AT 10:01 AM
    “SNS: I disagree; I don’t think his over-sized ego would Ever let him fake it. The ego is still intact, even as his mind turns to mush.’

    …and I must respectfully disagree in turn, not because I think there’s anything wrong with your basic premise that his ego IS, in fact, a HUGE driving force in his worthless life, but rather he concept that he’d have a CHOICE in the matter.

    Joe stood down HARD when his option was that Hillary would kill him, so he CAN be coerced, if not reasoned with. The Democrats never intended him to run, just to be the lightning rod so their REAL candidate wouldn’t spend the primary season making Trump’s campaign commercials or taking a stand on anything, the only question was Hill Or Mooch.

    And I think the Democrats answered that with their riots.

    They are MUCH too dedicated to identity politics at this point to cede ANY Black vote to President Trump, and need a credible threat of unimaginable violence if they don’t get their way. They also need a tabula rasa that, while not necessarily without known positions, at least isn’t established with a voting record on things political and can defray past opinions to justifiable anger over treasured liberal shibboleths.

    “Michelle” Obama fits those criteria nicely.

    “She” will return the Black vote with a vengeance, between being ACTUALLY Black and having the name of the first Black President that many will feel doubly racially loyal to honor. They won’t get EVERYONE, but they will get MOST. Love it or hate it, Black people DO tend to vote skin color über alles. Those that were known Trump supporters will be silcenced, and heavy pressure along with threats, assaults, and actual murder will be used to silence the rest, who have much to fear as Democrats are KNOWN to be harshest with any Black person who DARES step off the plantation. They have many, many overseeers and NO press or political oversight ON those overseers.

    THAT slaughter ALONE will be fearful.

    And all blamed on White Supremacists.

    “She” doesn’t have a political track record becasue “she’s” never had an actual office, so like “her” “husband” before “her”, “she” is a blank page politically on which the voters will be invited to write whatever their confirmation bias tells them to write on it, and there’s NO legislative history to say otherwise. Sure, “she’s” said some things about this or that, but “she” could always say they were just intial positions that have “evolved” (like Barry and Gay Marriage) or, more likely, attack her questioner with accusations that they are trying to pin an “Angry Black Woman” racist trope on “her”. Either way, the hoi polloi will see in “her” what they WANT to see in her, and no one can PROVE anything to the contrary.

    And I remember the rumblings in the 2012 election that God saved us from making the mistake of electing the scumbag Romney in. At one time it DID appear there was a TINY chance that Barry would be “out”, so much so that he hurried up and spent ahead on “Obamacare” money on his corrupt cronies so IT wouldn’t be there if HE wasn’t. Along with all the naked voter intimidation at the polling places that the Holder Department Of Just Us simiply dropped, there was a VERY strong, VERY broad threat that there would be riots like we’ve never SEEN that there would be open warfare between the races, and that Black people would storm out from the cities and have a Day of Jubilee against Whitey wherein millions would die. This, along with strong appeals to White Guilt and Proving Your Not Racist again tipped any on-the-fence Whites into voting for Barry in the hopes that it would buy them a few more quiet years to meekly live out their lives under the radar, kind of like what businesses and White people in Black areas do now by putting out BLM signs. Whether they thought Romney was good or Romney was bad was immaterial; they at LEAST knew Romney supporters wouldn’t burn down their house and rape their daugheters as they slit their throats for not being sufficiently repentant about the Nat Turner Rebellion’s outcome.

    As far as debating President Trump goes, “she” won’t. The most likely thing will be “her” campaign will put it out there that “she” didn’t have enough time to prepare to severely limit them, make some argument that a Black woman (so they say) will NOT sanctify a rayyyciss like Trump by agreeing to appear on stage with him, or answer whatever softball questions a Democrat moderator throws her way with off-the-top-rope accusations of racism by Trump regardless of the subject matter. “She’s” a one-trick pony, but it’s a REALLY effective trick.

    …the way I read it, then, is that Soros either buys or threatens Joe into making a speech about some vauge ‘health’ consideration that was aggrivated by the evil of Trump compels him to step aside “for the good of the Nation” (he’ll do it if Jill TELLS him to), and then, from the dais, nominate Mooch as his very worthy successor.

    As Caseser cynically did when offered the Crown of Rome, she will refuse.

    The floor delgates will go crazy(er) at that point, because who in the Democrat party would DARE be seen NOT loving a Black “Woman” AND an Obama! THEY will take up the cry (as the doddering Joe, slavering with hatred for what he was forced to do) is discreetly escorted backstage and out of political life, again acclaiming “her” to be their candidate to lead them FORWARD once again.

    “She” will protest that “She” is totally unprepared, that there are many excellent people they could choose (but “she” won’t NAME any), and that “She” simply wants to remain the dutiful “Wife” and “Mother” and support “her” party with her speeches as a private citizen.

    Pandemonium will erupt inside and outside the arena, as the brownshirts outside whip the paid-for throngs of rioters into a frenzy, which is shown on the screens inside the hall. The crowd will be calmed yet again, and Nancy Pelosi will beg her (as a White woman SHOULD), woman to “woman”, that in the interests of all the free people in the world, here and elsewhere, in the name of all the downtrodden refugees, in the name of “her” “own” “children” and in the sacred name of “her” “husband”, to PLEASE accept the nomination as the ONLY hope that the world would FINALLLY be rid of the orange evil that is Trump.

    …a heavy silence will fall. “Michelle”, “her” head bowed as though contemplating accepting a great weight, so overcome with emotion that they have to raise and cone the pin spot so you can’t see “her” throbbing erection, glycerine “tears” streaming down “her” face, will, finally, reluctantly, accept the heavy burden that the world has placed on “her”, the Chosen One, by fate and not by desire as one so great as “SHE” would be FAR to humble to propose it “HERSELF”.

    Immediately on a prearranged signal the huskiest members of the Nation of Islam (at least a half-dozen, it’s a LOT of weight) pick “her” up and parade “her” around as shoe stores far and wide are looted and burned in righteous Black celebration of a new Black era dawning.

    …This is ONE possible scenario, others can be devised, but they will differ only in the details. The refusal play is well-worn from Caesar before the Civil Wars to Cincinnatus before the Battle of Mount Algidus, and the devil doesn’t have to create anything NEW but rather use a PROVEN crowd motivator.

    And to arguments that Mooch is natively too lazy to do anything, I don’t disagree, but when they point out “she” will get those unbelievable vacations, luxury staff, paid ball washers and waxers, power to do anything to anyone at anytime, and that all ‘she’ has to do in return is be ‘her’ angry, mouthy self and occaionally read whatever Open Society TELLS her to and sign whatever Open Society TELLS her to, then “she” is free to buttrape all the men “she” wants the rest of the day while the press blocks “her” door while singing constant paeans to “her” greatness.

    …that’s how I see it playing out, and it’s a SERIOUS threat to the President and freedom if they do that.

    and they KNOW it.

    There’s a LOT of stupid out there.

    And ‘she’ could be their “QUEEN”.

    …In more ways than ONE…

    2
  6. That is telling. Why would you get “constantly tested” if you are OK? One test would show no problem and then you move on. Maybe a second test to confirm the results of the first. The only reason you’re constantly getting tested is so your handlers can monitor the decline. I have a relative who is losing it slowly. He thinks he’s OK despite the obvious decline and poor test results.

    3
  7. “The fact is I’m as sharp as ever. Why, just the other day I completed a jigsaw puzzle. And I did it in only 3 weeks, even though the box said 3 to 6 years.”

    2

Comments are closed.