Canada: Urban planner thinks the LGBTQ crowd can’t control their urges – IOTW Report

Canada: Urban planner thinks the LGBTQ crowd can’t control their urges

Jen Roberton, a Canadian urban planner who specializes in “public safety planning for LGBTQ2S+ [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, two-spirit] communities,” spoke to the Canadian Broadcasting Corportation’s Jim Brown about the “need” for parks to plan for public gay sex.

In the interview, Roberton said, “I feel as though in many cities, sex is already happening. You know, if we already have public sex taking place, why not acknowledge that as a fact and kind of plan for that?”   MORE at MRC.

SNIP: So let me get this straight. [lol] She thinks ALL of the alphabetized people are just retarded wild animals who don’t care who is watching them? Even children? And they’re okay with spreading deadly diseases and not be responsible for it?
Hey, gay people, don’t allow yourselves to become the  State Pet.  Do you see what the State  does to  the Natives, Blacks and Hispanics?

If you all claim to want to be respected, act respectfully and don’t hand over your leash to anyone.
[Unless you’re paying good money for that to happen. lol]

19 Comments on Canada: Urban planner thinks the LGBTQ crowd can’t control their urges

  1. he thinks ALL of the alphabetized people are just retarded wild animals who don’t care who is watching them?

    It’s certainly bad enough, but it’s not that bad: he just said deviants were performing deviant acts in public, but not that ALL their deviants were exhibiting their deviancy.

    Hmm. We have state flowers, state trees, state insects, state snack foods, so why not state perversions? “Welcome to Ontario, where the State Perversion is Public Corn-holing!”

  2. What did I just read?

    “…essential needs of queer people to have spaces to express their sexuality, in which they will not be traumatized and violated.”

    So the young boys are playing a ballgame and having fun (a few parents are around too), while on the sidelines grown men and women, homosexuals and lesbians, and other deviants are going at it two-forty. And no one need be “traumatized or violated”? Having there own fun, like dogs and cats and rabbits copulating in the nearby trees and bushes. Like animals. Just like animals would behave. Closer and closer we draw to the Tribulation Period and Judgement Day. How far are you going to let this go God? How far?

  3. We used to keep insane people in insane asylums. These problems didn’t exist.

    We need to go back to keeping insane people in insane asylums. These problems will then no longer exist.

    Does anyone, other than the insane, want a society that resembles the Roman aristocracy at their most degenerate? This is,of course, just before the all but complete collapse of their society.

  4. Geezuz, everytime I figure we’ll escape with just one supremely f*cked up moment we get someone else stepping on a landmine. First 22 minutes on the CBC now this twat. My only consolation is that the LGBTWhatever community should be going after her with pitchforks and torches but then maybe not as it seems stupidity, like death, seems to come in threes.

  5. “who specializes in “public safety planning for LGBTQS [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, two-spirit] communities”

    who makes up these job titles? when was this taught in college? when did this become a career choice?

    “the “need” for parks to plan for public gay sex.”

    why do the perverts need to have public park sex?

    ever notice it’s always about straights having to accommodate the gay (pervert) lifestyle, when they have no intention of accommodating the straight lifestyle or having consideration for it.

    but the straights are the haters?

  6. So what is he proposing? Creating little cubicles scattered about the place with grab bars, lube dispensers and wet wipes for cleanup?

    Maybe have each cubicle equipped with white noise emitters so that people don’t hear the slapping and grunting sounds?

    Maybe affix some graphical signs on each cubicle with some diagrams and explanatory verbiage so that small children can learn about what those two ladies with beards are doing in there that is making so much noise?

  7. Not that the Devil needs an advocate in a case like this, but doesn’t this open up the city/town/province to potential liability? If someone gets raped or contracts HIV in a park specifically landscaped to facilitate gay sex, doesn’t that fall under the umbrella of an “attractive nuisance”?

Comments are closed.