Democrat Alcee Hastings Settled Sexual Harassment Case With $220k Of Taxpayer Dollars – IOTW Report

Democrat Alcee Hastings Settled Sexual Harassment Case With $220k Of Taxpayer Dollars

DailyCaller: American taxpayers shelled out $220,000 to settle sexual harassment accusations against Democratic Florida Rep. Alcee Hastings, a new report reveals.

The Office of Compliance approved the settlement in 2014 after Winsome Packer, a former congressional staffer on a commission chaired by Hastings, accused the Democratic congressman of making sexual advances, touching her and threatening her job, documents obtained by Roll Call reveal.

Packer told Roll Call that she was “blackballed” after the incident.

REUTERS/Joe Skipper

“As an immigrant who came here with all these ideals, it is like someone just removed all the foundations that I stood on in this country for all these years,” she said. Packer was born in Jamaica, according to Roll Call.

Hastings, who has served in Congress since 1993, is the latest congressman to be caught up in a sexual harassment scandal.

 read more

19 Comments on Democrat Alcee Hastings Settled Sexual Harassment Case With $220k Of Taxpayer Dollars

  1. This level of Congressional corruption is disgusting. NO ONE should have to pay for crimes they did not commit. Why should taxpayers have to pay for his crimes? Every Congressional member who benefited from this act of corruption should have to reimburse the taxpayers plus interest and fines, just like the IRS charges.

  2. “Hastings, who has served in Congress …”
    “Served?”
    Fucking “served?” Are you kidding me?
    Wasn’t he impeached as a judge, or something, before he ran for Congress?
    I know … I get it … a “representative” Republic … and he “represents” his constituents … but really … shouldn’t the House uphold SOME standards of decency? Just as a pretense, if for no other reason?

    izlamo delenda est …

  3. Yeah-boy, this is the same Alcee Hastings who was impeached as a feddle judge after taking bribes and committing perjury. A thoughtful person might ask himself how it came about that the U.S. House convicted him in the impeachment proceedings and then a few years later didn’t have any ethical problem with seating him. He fit right in, don’t you know.

  4. @Uncle Al December 9, 2017 at 12:32 pm

    > paying the settlement is cheaper than the legal costs of defending against the suit

    Surely, that can’t be right. This would be a suit brought against the people that write the rules of the game. That would mean the game is broken by design. By the people who are paid to write the rules of the game. Even carnys aren’t allowed to do that.

Comments are closed.