DEMOCRAT LOGIC: PELOSI CLAIMS FIREARM SOUND SUPPRESSORS MUST BE REGULATED BECAUSE A PROGRESSIVE SHOT SCALISE WITHOUT ONE – IOTW Report

DEMOCRAT LOGIC: PELOSI CLAIMS FIREARM SOUND SUPPRESSORS MUST BE REGULATED BECAUSE A PROGRESSIVE SHOT SCALISE WITHOUT ONE

Milo- – -Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) was welcomed back to Congress on September 28 after recovering from being shot by an angry Bernie Sanders supporter at a ballgame in Alexandria, VA.
But Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) exploited Scalise’s return to argue that firearm sound suppressors (colloquially, if inaccurately, called “silencers” by people who don’t understand firearms) should stay regulated, even though the progressive gunman who opened fire on Congressional baseball players on June 14 didn’t use one.

According to Roll Call, Pelosi claims the GOP has situated suppressor deregulation “under the facade that it’s for hunters.” She doesn’t, like many leftists, actually know what a suppressor is as she claims suppressor deregulation would result in guns that could shoot completely silently, giving shooters the ability to remain undetected.

If Pelosi focused more on researching firearms and less about pushing her narrative she would know suppressors only muffle the ear-damaging shockwave of the weapon, they don’t eliminate the sound of the gunshot. read more

9 Comments on DEMOCRAT LOGIC: PELOSI CLAIMS FIREARM SOUND SUPPRESSORS MUST BE REGULATED BECAUSE A PROGRESSIVE SHOT SCALISE WITHOUT ONE

  1. Using her logic, or the lack of it, all flag poles must be regulated because gliders don’t have them.
    There has to be some kind of mental health exam she needs to take. Every time she opens her mouth, she sticks both feet in.

  2. Can pelosi run faster than 2000 ft /sec.?
    Doesn’t she know at that speed the bullet will hit you before you hear it, with or without a “silencer”?
    What does it take to make the stupid STFU?

  3. I live in KY. There is a Historic Marker for the Long Run Massacre on the way to Middletown. I bet Nancy Pelosi was screaming about the massacre weapon of choice: arrows. ‘Too silent, arrows kill people, no one should need more than two arrows to with which to hunt, and etc.’

    Of course, the time frame was BEFORE Indiginous Indians were ‘protected’ by the democRAT government. Speaking of which, there is a perfect example of Federal Government ‘taking care of you!’ SINGLE PAYER WILL BE A KILLER.

  4. In Europe, terrorists have taken to using vehicles to kill civilians. So I propose we outlaw mufflers so we can hear vehicles coming from a couple of miles away.

    I would also like to see rice cookers banned. Just because.

  5. I wonder if they keep her strapped on a chair in some day room at the Capital. Only bring her out to babble incoherently for the press, who seems to understand her.

Comments are closed.