DHS Official Placed on Leave, May Have Clearance Revoked After ‘Accidentally’ Adding Reporter to Email Chain on Upcoming ICE Raids – IOTW Report

DHS Official Placed on Leave, May Have Clearance Revoked After ‘Accidentally’ Adding Reporter to Email Chain on Upcoming ICE Raids

GP:
A DHS official was placed on leave and may have their security clearance revoked for ‘accidentally’ adding a reporter to an email chain about an upcoming ICE raids in greater Denver area.

According to NBC News, a DHS worker included a Washington-based reporter in an email chain detailing an upcoming ICE raids back in January.

The email did not include classified material, however, the information was still considered sensitive because it detailed time, location and target of raids.

The DHS worker called the reporter and told them that they were ‘accidentally’ added to the email. The reporter promised to disclose any information. The raids were conducted without incident, NBC News reported. more here

14 Comments on DHS Official Placed on Leave, May Have Clearance Revoked After ‘Accidentally’ Adding Reporter to Email Chain on Upcoming ICE Raids

  1. Mike Waltz needs to be given the boot too.

    Bondi is on thin ice with me. Trump had a guaranteed close to 2 years when he was sworn in. There’s no guarantee on the mid-terms outcome. If someone can’t get into the groove in two months, a replacement should be found.

    16
  2. Accident? I think not. More like a Leftist DHS employee purposely added that reporter, then claimed it to be an accident just to sabotage and cause chaos in multiple agencies in Trump’s Government. This DHS employee is not worried about being discharged and clearances revoked because a fantastic severance / retirement package has been arraigned via George Soreass.

    14
  3. Even if it was honest sloppiness, ya gotta go. Can’t have that nonsense and risk. You’re a liability, Bub.

    But I don’t think it was an accident. I’d be looking deeply into everything he’s been doing and people he’s ever communicated with the last 5 years.

    19
  4. Couple of questions:

    (1) If the deepstate/media is intent on taking you down, why help them do it?

    (2) How come if a woman is involved in some screwup, her name is kept private for as long as possible?

    11
  5. mystaclean
    Friday, 28 March 2025, 6:07 at 6:07 am

    “Trump had a guaranteed close to 2 years when he was sworn in. There’s no guarantee on the mid-terms outcome.”

    …if Soros and friends succeed in stealing the WI Supreme Court, the Communist will gerrymander the Republicans out of a House majority, and then the impeachments will begin again…

    “In the talk, dubbed a “national update and call to action” with newly elected Democratic Party chairman Ken Martin, Jeffries emphasized repeatedly that the Democrats needed only three House seats to block Republican President Donald Trump’s agenda.”

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2025/03/25/hakeem-jeffries-says-susan-crawford-could-give-democrats-better-maps/82645251007/

    …plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose…

    4
  6. It wasn’t just the “acccident” of him being added to the group. Based on press reports his phone number was put in the contact of a legitimate contact, so when the legitimate contact was added to the group, this reported was included without anyone’s knowledge.

    That’s not a mistake. A mistake is getting one or two digits wrong when building the contact. Putting an entirely different number in the contact is intentional. This group was set up to be a public embarrassment.

    5
  7. I hope that behind closed doors that the Pres is getting in peoples’ faces about this crap. Whomever hired these people needs to have a second look-see as well. I don’t care how high it goes. The leaks and sabotage has got to stop!

    3

Comments are closed.