AL:
Have you noticed that corrupt Democrats seem to get away with their scams? In Philadelphia, the Democrat district attorney is embroiled in a corruption scandal but he’s getting off the hook with pay!
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports:
Seth Williams’ corruption trial: The case against the Philly DA explained
What are his alleged crimes? Federal prosecutors have accused Williams of repeatedly misusing campaign cash and government property to live well beyond his means and selling the influence of his office to two wealthy benefactors who showered him with gifts including trips abroad, a $3,000 custom-built sofa and a used Jaguar convertible.
An African Democrat caught doing graft! I’m shocked, shocked, shocked I tell you!
Carlton? Oh No, not Carlton.
I’m not a prejudiced guy, in fact I’m still pretty open minded. But why is it once an black guy/gal gets into government work they are untouchable. Unless they come to work with their guns blazing they have a job for life. It might be true for white guys/gals too, but it just doesn’t seem like it.
Well, He’s innocent until proven guilty I guess and being a black Democrat in Philly doesn’t hurt.
In any event He should not be allowed near his office and should be suspended on half-pay until the conclusion of the case (either by trial or plea bargain). If found guilty (or pleads guilty or nolo contendere) then an immediate seizure of his assets for any fine levied as well as to pay back the half salary he received while suspended. If he is proven not guilty then the half pay held back is paid to him and he gets his job back.
I’m no lawyer, but don’t you need a current law license to be a District Attorney?
Is that one of those white black men?
And what’s with the used Jag?
Ain’t nobody got no used Caddies in Philly?
Spotting a Liberal:
If it’s a dude – bow tie, beta attitude, punchable face.
If it’s a chick – multi-colored hair, two last names, no makeup, usually unattractive.
You mean there are blacks in government that are corrupt? Didn’t see that coming.
Maxine’s nephew …. say it ain’the so.
Ok, he ain’t
“Well, He’s innocent until proven guilty …”
No. Innocence and/or guilt are established at the time the crime is committed.
By the state “presuming” innocence, the state must PROVE guilt beyond the doubt of a “reasonable man.”
If I kill someone and EVEN if I am charged, tried, and acquitted – I am STILL GUILTY of that death. There was NO POINT (in either time or space) where I would be innocent, once I killed that person.
The guy should have been removed from office, if for no other reason, than to keep him from mischief, although bad judgment should have been considered a sufficient excuse.
izlamo delenda est …