The Michael Sussmann case is heating up.
Techno Fog: On February 11, 2022, Durham filed the Government’s Motion to Inquire into Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Michael Sussmann case. Read it here. As you might recall, Sussmann was charged with giving false statements to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker regarding the interests he was representing in pushing to the FBI the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax. More background information on the Sussmann indictment can be found here.
The basis for the latest motion is that Sussmann’s current counsel, Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) might have a conflict of interest because Latham previously represented Perkins Coie and Mark Elias “in this investigation.” It is alleged that Latham “likely possesses confidential knowledge about Perkins Coie’s role in, and views concerning, Sussmann’s past activities.” (Cleaned up.)
There might also be a conflict because Latham was representing both the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America in the Special Counsel’s investigation. Durham observes that Latham’s duties to these former clients “might cause its interests to diverge from those of [Sussmann].”
Why might there be a conflict?
Because Durham might offer evidence at trial he obtained from the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America. And because certain employees of the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America might be witnesses at Sussmann’s trial. (Theoretically, a Clinton Campaign witness could be called by the prosecution to prove-up billing records and payments made to Sussmann. I’d guess they might have already testified to a grand jury about this.) more
“…because certain employees of the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America might be witnesses…”
Don’t bet the farm on it… they don’t want to wake up dead.
I don’t believe it!
Hillary was a gracious looser who conceded with dignity and maintained her poise.
She gave a wonderful speech at the end of the night, went to her hotel room, thanked Donna Brazile, kissed her husband and quietly sipped an herbal tea.
Finally! About time! Too late for most of us, but break out the Chardonnay and think how this news is going down in the Chappaqua hideout.
Trump to Leslie Stahl, “they spied on me”
LS: “there is no evidence”
The evil cunt kept pushing back.
This shit was so infuriating then, now I’m even madder than hell.
Don’t watch this…it will piss you off guaranteed!
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1492653266009739265?cxt=HHwWgsCy1ZWP_LYpAAAA
Marco,
Chardonnay?
Come on man.
Crack a beer after 9:00 am for the Canuck Truckers Eh!
LBS
Brilliant how he Pre-aired the unedited interview with Stahl.
Kcir, it shows that Trump is a far greater man than me.
I would have up & strangled the bitch dead.
I would have gone to jail happy though…
“And on March 23, 2031 Durham filed an affidavit …”
mortem tyrannis
izlamo delenda est …
Michael Sussmann did not kill himself.
No shit.
Question is, whattareya gonna DO about it?
*crickets*
….thats what I thought…
Thanks for the info, wake me when one of the prominent ones is heading off to prison.
“Durham: Clinton allies spied on the Executive Office of the President”
Well
DUH?
So is Durham going to prosecute or are we going to have to wait for Merrick Garland to do it, sometime after he’ll freezes over.
Kcir: Actually, that was a dig at President Elect Hillary Rodham Clinton, and her fondness for Chardonnay chased with Russian vodka. I’m cooking my Hungarian goulash this morning, with red wine added for the flavor that only comes from a bottle of red. I only add a third of a bottle to the meat and onions and drink the rest while the goulash is cooking. Luckily, I have more wine for dinner.
Gee, more crumbs from the Durham dinner table. I suppose we should be…grateful?
they’ll say it must have been a glitch
and something about intent.
just what would be the intent for spying on the President of the United States?
Highly doubtful it was just curiosity.
It was for subversion and removal from office.
The overthrow of our duly elected government.
This was/is a very serious offense, and should be punished by the existing, and appropriate, punishments for such actions. Otherwise, it will happen again.
Anybody proven guilty in this deserves a strongly worded letter of reprimand.
“…Anybody proven guilty in this deserves a strongly worded letter of reprimand…”
IN ALL CAPS!
Benito, start working on it!
billyhall2546, subversion, removal, overthrow, you have to be talking about Donny. He’s one & done, tossed back where he came from, the swamp.
trump’s statement is correct. The proper punishment is execution.
…happened such a long time ago, what difference does it make…etc. suck mfkng dick, h.r. clit-on.
Marco,
Oh that sounds GOOD!
I was just kidding around. Everyone knows you need a Deep Red Merlot in the Winter.
Have a fantastic Sunday!
Lookin’ forward to a heapin’ helpin’ of jack motherfucking shit being done about this. Democrats and deep staters can now officially do whatever the fuck they want with impunity.
Maybe now we know why the administration is pushing for war.
Perhaps Durham is going to come through on the goods after all and there needs to be a huge diversion.
And why is this not
TREASON DE FACTO
How many wrongs does Hillary have to be found
guilty of before she is declared
A CRIMINAL ?