Diphtheria, Death and Democracy – IOTW Report

Diphtheria, Death and Democracy

DMF: The Next Time Someone Tells You The World Would Be Better Off Without Descendants of White Europeans, Point Them to this Post.

It is remarkable when we consider how much the world population has increased over the last two centuries. Unfortunately the media is overly obsessed with reporting single events and with things that go wrong and does not nearly pay enough attention to the slow developments that reshape our world. And as social media is quickly turning into a latrine of ignorance and hate populated by educated fools as well as easily convinced de-evolving members of society with Obama phones and internet access who say we have fucked up the world. I speak of those who believe we must pay for the past.
In that past of which they speak, only a tiny elite was able to read and write. In 1820 only every 10th person older than 15 years was literate; in 1930 it was every third and now we are at 85% globally.   more here

13 Comments on Diphtheria, Death and Democracy

  1. The flaw in this statement is that Leftist hate themselves and thus hate all of Humanity. They will tell you that the world would be better off if there were no people. So all these advancements you point out are considered crimes by leftists.

  2. Now, there’s a “WTF?” moment.

    The fisking: When the facts (I won’t bother Snopes for veracity) are all as related to the premise as the airspeed of a coconut bearing swallow, what difference will thuthiness make?

    The takeaway: “The lung cancer finally stopped the smoking”. True. But, so what? The people who “brought us” (implying that the “discovery” was not inevitable) these “advances” (implying that all change is good), were not overthrown by the lowly “others”. The people who brought us these “advances” placed us beneath the current yoke by design. Since that was not a failure of their design, how can it’s results be “tragic”?

  3. @Larrythewhatever; Actually it did state that they participated in their own small way however the article was about the advances made by Europeans and their decendents which were shared by most of the world. All this is true so are you saying that it is racist to speak the truth? If all reference to Africa, Asia, the middle east were removed from the article it would still stand substantially the same, would it still be racist?
    On the other hand I’m not sure if you’re just joking.

Comments are closed.